<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Chatham Republican Town Committee</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008-05-10://1</id>
    <updated>2008-12-04T17:41:21Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Open Source 4.1</generator>

<entry>
    <title>CHATHAM REPUBLICANS MEET MONDAY, DECEMBER 8</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/chatham-republicans-meet-monday-december.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.602</id>

    <published>2008-12-04T17:33:24Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-04T17:41:21Z</updated>

    <summary>The regular monthly meeting of the Chatham Republican Town Committee will take place Monday, December 8th, at 7 p.m., at the Chatham Community Center, All Republicans and conservatives are welcome are welcome. For details contact Chairman Walter Bilowz waldad@aol.com and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Events" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The regular monthly meeting of the Chatham Republican Town Committee will take place Monday, December 8th, at 7 p.m., at the Chatham Community Center,   All Republicans and conservatives are welcome are welcome. For details contact Chairman Walter Bilowz waldad@aol.com and 508 776 5694.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>SEN. SAXBY CHAMBLISS: PALIN &quot;A GREAT FUTURE&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/sen-saxby-chambliss-palin-a-great-future.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.601</id>

    <published>2008-12-04T17:23:22Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-04T17:31:51Z</updated>

    <summary>Saxby Chambliss won the run-off in Georgia to preserve a vital seat for U.S. Senate Republicans, holding Democrats short of a filibuster-proof 60 votes. He achieved a smashing victory, capturing 57% of the vote. This morning Senator Chambliss was interviewed...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="2010 -- THE WAY FORWARD" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="American Values" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="americanvalues" label="AMERICAN VALUES" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="chambliss" label="CHAMBLISS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="future" label="FUTURE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="georgia" label="GEORGIA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="palin" label="PALIN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="republicanstar" label="REPUBLICAN STAR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Saxby Chambliss won the run-off in Georgia to preserve a vital seat for U.S. Senate Republicans, holding Democrats short of a filibuster-proof 60 votes. He achieved a smashing victory, capturing 57% of the vote.</p>

<p>This morning Senator Chambliss was interviewed on Fox's morning program.  He thanked all those Republican heavyweights who had come into the state to campaign for him -- Giuliani, Romney, McCain, Huckabee among others.  Sarah Palin came at his invitation the day before of and the day of the election.  Chamblis said this:</p>

<blockquote>“You want to peak on the last day, and we had John McCain, Mike Huckabee, Governor [Mitt] Romney and Rudy Giuliani. But Sarah Palin came in on the last day and man, she was dynamite. We packed the houses everywhere we went.” 

<p>Kilmeade asked, “You saw all the heavyweights in the Republican Party show up . . . tell me about Sarah Palin. Will her popularity last?” </p>

<p>“I cannot see it diminishing," the senator answered. “I can’t overstate the impact she had down here. All these folks did a great job, they all allowed us to add momentum, but when she walks in a room, folks just explode. She’s a dynamic lady, a great administrator, and I think she’s got a great future in the Republican Party.” </blockquote></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>MUSLIM BARBARIANS KILL IN MUMBAI AND KIDNAP  AT SEA</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/barbarians-in-mumbai-islamic-killers.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.600</id>

    <published>2008-12-04T04:08:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-04T04:30:36Z</updated>

    <summary>Barbarians. In Mumbai, Islamic killers murdered 172 or more. Random killings in restaurants, hotel corridors, shopping malls, aiming at foreigners and rich Indians to strike terror, hurt commerce and destroy terrorism. Ramdom, except for Mohammad&apos;s favorite target, Jews, whom they...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islamic supremacism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="barbarian" label="BARBARIAN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islam" label="ISLAM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mumbai" label="MUMBAI" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="murder" label="MURDER" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="muslim" label="MUSLIM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pakistan" label="PAKISTAN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pirates" label="PIRATES" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Barbarians.</p>

<p>In Mumbai, Islamic killers murdered 172 or more.  Random killings in restaurants, hotel corridors, shopping malls, aiming at foreigners and rich Indians to strike terror, hurt commerce and destroy terrorism.  Ramdom, except for Mohammad's favorite target, Jews, whom they sought out in a small Orthodox synagogue serving Jews passing through Mumbai.  Those there were all tortured and killed, except for a 2-year old left crying hysterically over the twisted bodies of his mother, six-month pregnant, and rabbi father.</p>

<p>Not that far away Muslim pirates terrorize shipping lanes for hostages and ransom, much as Muslim pirates did in the Mediterranean for centuries till President Jefferson put an end to it.</p>

<p>There is no right or wrong as the West knows it in Islam.  The model is the perfect man Mohammad.  If he raped, pillaged, raided caravans and killed Jews, why, then, true believers in Islam can do what their founder did.  And they do.</p>

<p>As Mohammad did it for wealth and power, so too do his modern day followers.</p>

<p>A personal note:  This summer a wonderful cruise took place on the Regatta, an identical sister ship of the Nautica, both owned by the cruise line Oceania.  So the Nautica's brush with Muslim pirates has special meaning.    </p>

<p>Allowing this alien ideology into the West is a serious mistake that hopefully will be corrected before it is too late.  It is late already for Europe.<br />
<blockquote><br />
<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081203/ap_on_re_mi_ea/piracy"><strong><big>Cruise passengers describe "cheeky" pirate attack</big></strong></a><br />
By SEBASTIAN ABBOT, Associated Press Writer Sebastian Abbot, Associated Press Writer <br />
Wed Dec 3, 5:12 pm ET<br />
 <br />
MUSCAT, Oman – Ordered to get inside and stay down, Oregon tourist Clyde Thornburg heard the pirates' rifle shots hit the side of the luxury cruise liner — "Pop! Pop! Pop!" — then felt the ship speed up to escape.</p>

<p>At this port north of the pirate-infested Gulf of Aden, passengers told The Associated Press on Wednesday they had been warned of the danger even before they embarked, and the crew used a device that blasted painful high-decibel sound waves to keep the marauders at bay.</p>

<p>The attack on the nearly 600-foot-long cruise ship in the dangerous waters between Yemen and Somalia was the latest evidence pirates have grown more brazen, viewing almost any vessel as a potential target — even a large luxury liner with hundreds of tourists on board.</p>

<p>But the assault on the M/S Nautica lasted only five minutes Sunday, and the ship with about 650 passengers and 400 crew members sped away quickly and was not seized.</p>

<p>"We didn't think they would be cheeky enough to attack a cruise ship," said Wendy Armitage, of Wellington, New Zealand, shortly after disembarking for a daylong port stop in the Omani capital of Muscat.</p>

<p>During the assault, pirates on one of two skiffs fired eight rifle shots at the ship, according to its American operator, Oceania Cruises, Inc. The captain ordered the passengers inside and accelerated the cruise liner quickly, leaving the pirates far behind in their 20- to 30-foot wooden speedboats, powered with twin outboard motors.</p>

<p>"I couldn't see them shooting, but I heard them hitting the ship, 'Pop! Pop! Pop!'" said Thornburg, of Bend, Ore. "It wasn't really scary because the captain announced for the safety of everybody to get inside and get down, and by that time he was pouring on the coals to the ship and was outrunning them."</p>

<p>Lynne Pincini of Australia said she was heading to a friend's cabin when the order came to keep their heads down and stay inside.</p>

<p>"We heard the announcement, and of course we went straight out on the balcony to have a look," she said. "It was like a very large speedboat. It was running alongside the boat."</p>

<p>The passengers were on a monthlong cruise from Rome to Singapore, a route that took them through the Gulf of Aden between Somalia and Yemen, where pirates have hijacked dozens of vessels this year.</p>

<p>Cargo ships, cruise liners and other vessels use the route — the only access to the Suez Canal shortcut between East and West — unless they are willing to add weeks to the trip by traveling around the southern tip of Africa.</p>

<p>At the beginning of the journey, the Nautica's captain briefed the passengers on what the vessel could do to ward off pirates.</p>

<p>Alicia Moorehead said they were told the Nautica could outrun pirates and was equipped with high-pressure water hoses and a device that blasts painful sound waves at any bandits. Such devices can emit sounds up to 150 decibels — well above the normal pain threshold of 120 decibels — focused on targets several hundred yards away.</p>

<p>"We had been reassured that they had these ghetto blasters that could go through them. And we could outrun anything that they had," Pincini said.</p>

<p>Moorehead's husband, Pat, said the crew laid out the water hoses before the vessel entered the Gulf of Aden.</p>

<p>"They had laid out the fire hoses for a high pressure repellant. They never did fire them up, but they were ready for them," said Moorehead, a native of Long Beach, Calif.</p>

<p>"I will say the crew was very calm. They had prepared for this. Every staff member has an assignment in case of an emergency, and every one of them did it calmly and quickly," he added.</p>

<p>Some passengers said the crew used the long-range acoustic device to ward off the attack, and at least two passengers described hearing two booms after the pirates fired their rifles. </p>

<p>Oceania Cruises would not comment on specific details of the ship's security other than to say the ship's captain and crew used "evasive maneuvers and took all prescribed precautions." </p>

<p>Roger Middleton, author of a recent report on piracy for the London-based think tank Chatham House, said such non-lethal defenses are preferable to having armed guards on board — but their effectiveness is limited. Earplugs can foil the sound device, for example. </p>

<p>The ship's high speed and the difficulty of boarding such a large ship probably were the reasons the pirates were not successful, Middleton said. </p>

<p>"Lots of pirate attacks fail ... They will go for anything and keep trying until they get on board," he said. "I think they see these things as how much money they get out of them. And lots of Western tourists is very valuable." </p>

<p>International warships patrol the Gulf of Aden and have created a security corridor under a U.S.-led initiative, but attacks on shipping have not abated. </p>

<p>In about 100 attacks off the Somali coast this year, 40 vessels have been seized. Thirteen remain in the hands of pirates, including a Saudi supertanker filled with $100 million worth of crude and a Ukrainian ship loaded with 33 battle tanks. </p>

<p>Large ransoms are usually paid for the release of hijacked vessels, but a Somali official maintained Wednesday that a Yemeni cargo ship and its eight crew members were freed without a ransom after an appeal by local clan elders and regional officials. </p>

<p>The ship, released Tuesday, was seized last month in the Arabian Sea. A Yemeni security official had said the pirates were demanding a $2 million ransom</blockquote></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ISLAMIC MUMBAI KILLERS TARGETED JEWS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/islamic-mumbai-killers-targeted-jews.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.599</id>

    <published>2008-12-03T12:32:06Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-03T13:02:43Z</updated>

    <summary>The ten Islamic terrorists sent from Pakistan to commit murder in Mumbai were specifically told to target the small Jewish center for Jews traveling through India. Five hostages were found tortured and murdered, so badly so that the pathologist said...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islamic supremacism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Israel" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="islam" label="ISLAM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islamicsupremacism" label="ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islamicterrorism" label="ISLAMIC TERRORISM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="israel" label="ISRAEL" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jewhatred" label="JEW HATRED" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jews" label="JEWS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The ten Islamic terrorists sent from Pakistan to commit murder in Mumbai were specifically told to target the small Jewish center for Jews traveling through India.  Five hostages were found tortured and murdered, so badly so that the pathologist said he had never seen such brutality.  The 29-year old rabbi from New York and his six-month pregnant wife of 28 were murdered, their 2-year old son survived.  What did they have to do with Kashmir, Iraq, Hindu violence?  They were sought out and killed because they were Jews.  </p>

<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,459564,00.html"><strong><big>Orphan of New York Rabbi and Wife Killed in Mumbai Attacks Leaves India</big></strong></a><br />
Monday , December 01, 2008</p>

<p> The 2-year-old orphan found drenched in the blood of his parents at the besieged Jewish center in Mumbai left India on Monday on an Israeli Air Force jet, accompanied by the Indian woman who rescued him.<div style="align: right;"><img src="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/images/2008/12/MumbaiJewishOrphan.jpg" width="320" height="240" alt="MumbaiJewishOrphan.jpg"/></div><br />
<small>Dec. 1: Moshe Holtzberg, the orphan of the rabbi and wife slain in the Mumbai Jewish center, cries during a memorial service at a synagogue in Mumbai.</small></p>

<p>Moshe Holtzberg's parents, Rabbi Gavriel Noach Holtzberg and his wife, Rivka, ran the headquarters of the ultra-Orthodox Chabad Lubavitch movement in Mumbai — one of 10 targets besieged by gunman over the 60-hour rampage.</p>

<p>During the attack Thursday, Sandra Samuel, a nanny who worked there for years, had locked herself in a laundry room when she heard Rivkah screaming for her to help. Then the screaming stopped, and it was quiet, said Robert Katz, a New York-based fund-raiser for an Israeli orphanage founded by the boy's family.</p>

<p>Samuel cracked open the door of her hiding place and saw a deserted staircase. She ran up one flight and saw the rabbi and his wife, covered in blood and shot to death. The child was crying beside his parents' bodies, his pants drenched in blood.</p>

<p>She snatched the boy, bolted down the stairs and out of the building.</p>

<p>"She's been there with him throughout," Katz said.</p>

<p>Six civilians were killed in the center — all of them Jewish and four of them Israeli, Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Andy David said. In all, more than 170 died in attacks on 10 targets across the Indian city.</p>

<p>Moshe was accompanied on the trip to Israel by his maternal grandparents, Yehudit and Shimon Rosenberg, who were reunited with their grandson when they arrived in Mumbai on Friday.</p>

<p>"It was pure raw emotion, tears of joy, tears of sorrow, incredible emotion, understandably out of control," said Katz.</p>

<p>Asked about Moshe's condition, he said: "I don't know that he can comprehend or that he will remember seeing his parents shot in cold blood."</p>

<p>Before the child's departure, dozens gathered at a synagogue in Mumbai for a memorial service for the Jews slain at the Chabad center. During the service, Moshe burst into tears and called out "Ima," Hebrew for "mother."</p>

<p>Weeping, Shimon Rosenberg delivered a eulogy for his daughter and son-in-law, reciting the Hebrew phrases from the Book of Job: "The Lord giveth. The Lord taketh away. Blessed be the name of the Lord."</p>

<p>Moshe's father was a dual American-Israeli citizen and his mother was Israeli. The couple lived in Israel and Brooklyn before they moved to Mumbai in 2003.</p>

<p>Samuel, an Indian resident, will live with Moshe in Israel "so at least he has someone he knows and recognizes and loves," said Katz.</p>

<p>Though Samuel has no passport or papers, Moshe's grand-uncle, Rabbi Yitzchak David Grossman, helped arrange for her to get a visa to Israel. In a sad coincidence, Grossman is founder of the Migdal Ohr, which says it is Israel's largest facility for orphaned and disadvantaged children.</p>

<p>The Israeli jet that carried Moshe and Samuel also carried the remains of his parents and the others killed at the Chabad House, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said.</p>

<p>Government officials planned a small ceremony upon the plane's arrival.</p>

<p>"There are going to be thousands of people at this funeral," said Katz, executive vice president of Migdal Ohr's fundraising arm in New York. "This couple wasn't living in the West Bank. They weren't settlers. They weren't occupying anyone's land. They were killed because they were Jews, simple and plain."</p>

<p>---------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
From the Hadith, the sayings and actions of Mohammad:</p>

<p>.“The Last Hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: `Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him’; but the tree Gharkad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews.” (Sahih Muslim, Book 40, Number 6985). <br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>EVIDENCE MOUNTS MUMBAI MURDERERS WERE PAKISTANI ISLAMIC TERRORISTS </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/evidence-mounts-mumbai-murderers-pakista.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.598</id>

    <published>2008-12-03T04:03:49Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-03T13:04:53Z</updated>

    <summary>The Wall Street Journal continues its extraordinary reporting of the murders by Islamic supremacists in Mumbai. (For its earlier report, click here.) Evidence collected by American and Indian intelligence points to a Pakistani mastermind of the massacre. All ten of...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islamic supremacism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="islam" label="ISLAM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islamicsupremacism" label="ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mumbia" label="MUMBIA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="terror" label="TERROR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal continues its extraordinary reporting of the murders by Islamic supremacists in Mumbai.  (For its earlier report, <a href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/the-islamic-terror-attack-on-mumbai.shtml">click here.) </a>Evidence collected by American and Indian intelligence points to a Pakistani mastermind of the massacre.  All ten of the terrorists were Pakistani.  The one survivor has been confirming information that was intercepted by American communications monitoring.</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122823715860872789.html">Read the story that will appear in tomorrow's WSJ:</a></p>

<p>DECEMBER 3, 2008</p>

<p><big><strong> India Names Mumbai Mastermind Article</strong></big></p>

<p>By GEETA ANAND, MATTHEW ROSENBERG, YAROSLAV TROFIMOV and ZAHID HUSSAIN</p>

<p>MUMBAI -- India has accused a senior leader of the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba of orchestrating last week's terror attacks that killed at least 172 people here, and demanded the Pakistani government turn him over and take action against the group.<br />
Just two days before hitting the city, the group of 10 terrorists who ravaged India's financial capital communicated with Yusuf Muzammil and four other Lashkar leaders via a satellite phone that they left behind on a fishing trawler they hijacked to get to Mumbai, a senior Mumbai police official told The Wall Street Journal. The entire group also underwent rigorous training in a Lashkar-e-Taiba camp in Pakistani-controlled Kashmir, the official said.</p>

<p>Mr. Muzammil had earlier been in touch with an Indian Muslim extremist who scoped out Mumbai locations for possible attack before he was arrested early this year, said another senior Indian police official. The Indian man, Faheem Ahmed Ansari, had in his possession layouts drawn up for the Taj Mahal Palace & Tower hotel and Mumbai's main railway station, both prime targets of last week's attack, the police official said.</p>

<p>Mr. Ansari, who also made sketches and maps of locations in southern Mumbai that weren't attacked, had met Mr. Muzammil and trained at the same Lashkar camp as the terrorists in last week's attack, an official said.</p>

<p>U.S. officials agreed that Mr. Muzammil was a focus of their attention in the attacks, though they stopped short of calling him the mastermind. "That is a name that is definitely on the radar screen," a U.S. counterterrorism official said.</p>

<p>Information gathered in the probe also continues to point to a connection to Lashkar-e-Taiba, that official said. Along with a confession from the one gunman captured in the attacks, officials cited phone calls intercepted by satellite during the attacks that connected the assailants to members of Lashkar-e-Taiba in Pakistan, and the recovered satellite phone from the boat.</p>

<p>It also emerged Tuesday that U.S. authorities had warned Indian officials of a pending attack by sea. Hasan Gafoor, Mumbai police commissioner, told reporters there was a general warning issued in September that hotels could be targeted as well, after the bombing of the Marriot Hotel in Islamabad.</p>

<p>Two militants arrested in early 2007 also told police officials then that they were part of a band of eight Lashkar members who slipped into India by boat from Karachi, Pakistan, and made their way to Mumbai, an Indian police official in Kashmir said in an interview Tuesday. The group broke into pairs -- just as last week's attackers did -- and made their way north using safehouses provided by local sympathizers, the police official said.</p>

<p>The evidence cited by investigators is giving fresh ammunition to the Indian government, which has long tried to pressure Pakistan into cracking down on Lashkar-e-Taiba. India claims the group enjoys support from elements of the Pakistani intelligence agency. Pakistan denies that and outlawed the organization in 2002, but has done little to curtail its operations.</p>

<p>Mr. Muzammil's name is on a list of people -- numbering about 20 in all -- that India gave Pakistan earlier this week, demanding their immediate extradition, a senior Pakistani official told the Journal. The official said Pakistan was examining India's list of suspects and has assured New Delhi that action would be taken against them if there is evidence of involvement in the attacks.</p>

<p>Any move by the shaky civilian government of Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari against Lashkar-e-Taiba could create a huge backlash, however, particularly from Islamic groups, said a senior official in Pakistan. On Tuesday, Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani convened a meeting of all of the country's political parties in the capital to develop a joint response to Indian demands for extradition.</p>

<p>"The government of Pakistan has offered a joint investigation mechanism and we are ready to compose such a team which will help the investigation," Pakistan's Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said in a televised statement. Mr. Qureshi, however, declined to say whether Pakistan would hand over any of those sought by India.</p>

<p>The Mumbai attacks have ratcheted up tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors, who have been exchanging verbal fire for the past several days and sparking fears of a conflict. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is scheduled to arrive in India Wednesday, as is Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff.<br />
Indian authorities say evidence highlights how Lashkar has broadened its operations to include recruitment of both Indian and Pakistani Muslim extremists.</p>

<p>Lashkar-e-Taiba -- literally Army of the Good -- has been implicated by Indian officials in several recent terrorist attacks on Indian soil. The group initially focused on fighting the Indian army in the disputed state of Kashmir. Over the years, it has expanded its cause into the rest of India and aims to establish Islamic rule.</p>

<p>India has told Pakistan that the latest attacks in Mumbai were masterminded by Mr. Muzammil, aided by others in Lashkar's senior ranks including an operative named Asrar Shah, according to a senior Pakistani official. Mr. Muzammil, a Pakistani in his mid-30s, became head of Lashkar-e-Taiba's anti-Indian planning cell some three months ago, according to Dipankar Banerjee, director of the Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies, an independent think tank in New Delhi. Indian authorities believe he is in Pakistan but officials there haven't acknowledged that.</p>

<p>India also claims the attacks were approved by Hafiz Muhammed Saeed, the Pakistani official said. Mr. Saeed is the head of Jamaat-ud-Dawa, the parent organization of the Lashkar group. Mr. Saeed, who is free in Pakistan, denied the accusations. "India has always accused me without any evidence," he told Pakistan's GEO News television channel.</p>

<p>Indian investigators -- helped in part by the testimony of the one terrorist they captured alive, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab -- say they now possess solid proof. "We have made substantial progress in the investigation," said A.N. Roy, director general of the State Police of Maharashtra, where Mumbai is located.</p>

<p>According to Mumbai police chief Hasan Gafoor, Mr. Kasab told interrogators that he and fellow gunmen spent between a year and 18 months in a Lashkar-e-Taiba camp.</p>

<p>An armed policeman guards the Victoria Terminus station on Tuesday in Mumbai.<br />
The 10 militants left Pakistan's port city of Karachi on Nov. 23 aboard a ship called the Al Husseini, which also carried a crew of seven, another senior police official said. Investigators believe that all the 10 gunmen were Pakistani because they spoke Punjabi or Punjabi-accented Urdu.</p>

<p>When they entered Indian waters, the terrorists hijacked a fishing trawler called the Kuber and took its five crew members prisoner. The terrorists transferred four of them to the Al Husseini and they were subsequently killed, police believe. The terrorists kept the Kuber's lead crewman alive and sailed close to Mumbai.</p>

<p>The terrorists abandoned the Kuber in haste, fearing detection by an approaching vessel, the senior police official said. In the process, they forgot their satellite phone on the Kuber. Investigators found in the call log the numbers of five people, including Mr. Muzammil, two of his deputies and his personal aide, the senior police official said. Indian officials had already intercepted phone conversations made while the terrorists were traveling to Mumbai.</p>

<p>Indian Muslim leaders are skeptical of Lashkar's reach into India. But police say Lashkar has increasingly sought contacts and recruits among Indian extremists. In October, for instance, five Muslims from the southern state of Kerala were recruited into Lashkar-e-Taiba and traveled to the Indian part of Kashmir, according to T.K. Vinod Kumar, Kerala's deputy inspector-general of police. They tried to cross the line of control that runs between India and Pakistan and reach training camps on the Pakistani side.<br />
Four among the group were killed in a firefight with the Indian military during that attempt. The fifth, construction worker Abdul Jabbar, was arrested two weeks ago, Mr. Kumar says.</p>

<p>Unlike other Pakistani-based jihadist organizations, Lashkar draws its recruits across a broad social spectrum, from universities as well as among unemployed youths. The majority come from Punjab; Mr. Kasab used to live in the Punjabi village of Faridkot, according to Indian investigators.</p>

<p>In March 2007 when two militants were arrested in the Indian-controlled section of Kashmir, the pair told police that Lashkar was looking to start slipping people into India from the sea to avoid heavily guarded land borders. The sea also provided a winter route to Kashmir for Lashkar members, when high mountain passes crossing to India's part of the state are often blanketed by deep snow.</p>

<p> —Siobhan Gorman, David Crawford, Tariq Engineer and Peter Wonacott contributed to this article.</p>

<p align="center"><img src="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/images/2008/12/MumbaiTerroristTracks.gif" width="510" height="413" alt="MumbaiTerroristTracks.gif"/></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS &quot;RIGHT,&quot; AFTER ALL</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/freedom-of-speech-is-right-after-all.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.597</id>

    <published>2008-12-02T23:42:29Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-02T23:50:13Z</updated>

    <summary>Once again, Professor Sowell speaks clearly about the growing fascism of the left. This time he shows how the fascists operate in academia. (Hounding Lawrence Summers out of the presidency of Harvard for the unforgivable sins of supporting the return...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="American Values" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Sowell" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Once again, Professor Sowell speaks clearly about the growing fascism of the left. This time he shows how the fascists operate in academia.  (Hounding Lawrence Summers out of the presidency of Harvard for the unforgivable sins of supporting the return of ROTC to campus and wondering out loud if genetics had anything to do with the poor performance of females in science is another example of academic fascism at work.)<br />
<blockquote><br />
<a href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell120208.php3"><big><strong>Freedom and the Left</strong></big></a><br />
Thomas Sowell<br />
Tuesday, December 02, 2008<br />
Most people on the left are not opposed to freedom. They are just in favor of all sorts of things that are incompatible with freedom. </p>

<p>Freedom ultimately means the right of other people to do things that you do not approve of. Nazis were free to be Nazis under Hitler. It is only when you are able to do things that other people don't approve that you are free. </p>

<p>One of the most innocent-sounding examples of the left's many impositions of its vision on others is the widespread requirement by schools and by college admissions committees that students do "community service." </p>

<p>There are high schools across the country from which you cannot graduate, and colleges where your application for admission will not be accepted, unless you have engaged in activities arbitrarily defined as "community service." </p>

<p>The arrogance of commandeering young people's time, instead of leaving them and their parents free to decide for themselves how to use that time, is exceeded only by the arrogance of imposing your own notions as to what is or is not a service to the community. </p>

<p>Working in a homeless shelter is widely regarded as "community service"-- as if aiding and abetting vagrancy is necessarily a service, rather than a disservice, to the community. </p>

<p>Is a community better off with more people not working, hanging out on the streets, aggressively panhandling people on the sidewalks, urinating in the street, leaving narcotics needles in the parks where children play? </p>

<p>This is just one of the ways in which handing out various kinds of benefits to people who have not worked for them breaks the connection between productivity and reward, as far as they are concerned. </p>

<p>But that connection remains as unbreakable as ever for society as a whole. You can make anything an "entitlement" for individuals and groups but nothing is an entitlement for society as a whole, not even food or shelter, both of which have to be produced by somebody's work or they will not exist. </p>

<p>What "entitlements" for some people mean is forcing other people to work for their benefit. As a bumper sticker put it: "Work harder. Millions of people on welfare are depending on you." </p>

<p>The most fundamental problem, however, is not which particular activities students are required to engage in under the title of "community service." </p>

<p>The most fundamental question is: What in the world qualifies teachers and members of college admissions committees to define what is good for society as a whole, or even for the students on whom they impose their arbitrary notions? </p>

<p>What expertise do they have that justifies overriding other people's freedom? What do their arbitrary impositions show, except that fools rush in where angels fear to tread? <br />
What lessons do students get from this, except submission to arbitrary power? </p>

<p>Supposedly students are to get a sense of compassion or noblesse oblige from serving others. But this all depends on who defines compassion. In practice, it means forcing students to undergo a propaganda experience to make them receptive to the left's vision of the world. </p>

<p>I am sure those who favor "community service" requirements would understand the principle behind the objections to this if high school military exercises were required. </p>

<p>Indeed, many of those who promote compulsory "community service" activities are bitterly opposed to even voluntary military training in high schools or colleges, though many other people regard military training as more of a contribution to society than feeding people who refuse to work.</blockquote></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>THE ISLAMIC TERROR ATTACK ON MUMBAI</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/the-islamic-terror-attack-on-mumbai.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.587</id>

    <published>2008-12-01T16:15:59Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-02T22:06:45Z</updated>

    <summary>Just ten Islamic terrorists did it all. Just ten men paralyzed Mumbai for three days, killing at least 174. Only one survived and he&apos;s from Pakistan. This gripping account by the Wall Street Journal is a tale of horror and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="International Affairs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islamic supremacism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="india" label="INDIA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islam" label="ISLAM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islamicsupremacism" label="ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islamicterrorism" label="ISLAMIC TERRORISM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mumbai" label="MUMBAI" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just ten Islamic terrorists did it all.</p>

<p>Just ten men paralyzed Mumbai for three days, killing at least 174.  Only one survived and he's from Pakistan.</p>

<p>This gripping account by the Wall Street Journal is a tale of horror and sheer incompetence on the part of the Indian police and much of the military.</p>

<blockquote>DECEMBER 1, 2008 

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122809281744967855.html"><big><strong>India Under Fire for Security in Wake of Attacks</strong></big></a><br />
 <br />
<strong>At Tourist Haunts and Train Station, Swiftly Launched Assault Overwhelmed Police; Home Affairs Minister Steps Down</strong></p>

<p>By YAROSLAV TROFIMOV, GEETA ANAND, PETER WONACOTT and MATTHEW ROSENBERG<br />
    <br />
MUMBAI -- As waiters started setting dinner buffets in Mumbai's luxurious hotels, the killings that would ravage this Indian metropolis began out of sight, in the muddy waters of the Arabian Sea.</p>

<p>In the dusk hours of Wednesday, fisherman Chandrakant Tare was sailing his boat about 100 yards from a fishing trawler when he spotted young men killing a sailor on board. He says he saw them toss the body into the engine room. Assuming he had stumbled upon pirates, Mr. Tare says, he sped away.</p>

<p>Hours later, at least 10 terrorists, having arrived by small craft on the shores of Mumbai, began to sow death and destruction at will across India's financial capital.</p>

<p>Pieced together from interviews with dozens of witnesses and officials, this account of the three days of the battle for Mumbai shows just how a small but ruthless group of skilled militants, attacking multiple targets in quick succession, managed to bring one of the world's largest cities to its knees. The human toll -- currently at 174 fatalities, including nine terrorists -- was exacerbated by the Indian authorities' lack of preparedness for such a major attack. But the chain of events also points to just how vulnerable any major city can be to this type of urban warfare.</blockquote></p>

<p align="center"><img src="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/images/2008/12/MumbaiRamirez120108.gif" width="525" height="357" alt="MumbaiRamirez120108.gif"/></p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote>Authorities are still questioning the one captured terrorist, a 21-year-old Pakistani named Ajmal Qasab, who they say has confessed to training with outlawed Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba. The investigation remains in its very early stages; previously an unknown militant group Deccan Mujahideen had claimed responsibility, and the identities of the killed militants remain unknown.

<p>Around 8:30 p.m. Wednesday, one dinghy with half a dozen young men landed at a trash-strewn harbor near the southern tip of the Mumbai peninsula, witnesses say; a second arrived nearby shortly after. Mostly in their early- to mid-20s, the men came ashore wearing dark clothes and hauling heavy bags and backpacks, according to fisherman Ajay Mestry, who saw one of the landings. The group he saw split up and raced toward the shimmering city.</p>

<p>Arriving by boat, a small team of terrorists spread out across Mumbai, instilling terror in India's largest city for three days.</p>

<p>When one young man with a bulging bag jogged up from the beach, Anita Rajendra Udayaar, the keeper of a roadside stall full of recycled plastic bottles, asked where he was heading. "Mind your own business!" he shouted back, she recalls.</p>

<p>Mumbai's attention that night was focused on one of the country's favorite sports: cricket. India was playing against England, and beating its old colonial master. In the open-air Cafe Leopold, a popular people-watching spot a short distance from the landing site, customers -- many of them foreign backpackers -- were watching the match.<br />
At about 9:30 p.m., two gunmen with assault rifles appeared on the sidewalk, witnesses said. One stood at the entrance, the second to his left. Then they started firing. Minutes later, they walked away, leaving more than a dozen casualties behind amid upturned, bloodied tables.</p>

<p>At about the same time, two other gunmen arrived at a Bharat Petroleum gas station at the corner of a small alley that leads to Chabad House, also known as Nariman House, the local outlet of the Brooklyn-based Chabad-Lubavitch Jewish movement. With its small, faded sign, the five-story Chabad House -- which served as a guesthouse and source of kosher food for the many Israeli backpackers who travel through India -- is so hard to find that most visitors ask for directions at the gas station. But the militants knew their way, a station attendant says: Without stopping, they threw a hand grenade into the gas station, and walked into the alley.</p>

<p>Alarmed by the explosion, Chabad House's rabbi, Gavriel Holtzberg, called the Israeli consulate. The two gunmen burst into his building, taking a number of Israelis, a young Mexican Jewish woman, and the rabbi and his family hostage. It appears that they quickly shot dead one of the guests, an Israeli kosher ritual inspector, whose body would be found badly decomposed at the end of the siege.</p>

<p>The explosion and gunfire attracted the attention of neighbors. Some young men started throwing stones towards the building. Manush Goheil, a 25-year-old tailor, stepped outside the family's shop to get a better view. His brother Harish watched from the shop as a gunman shot him dead with a well-aimed bullet fired from the Chabad House's top floor.</p>

<p>Around the same time about one mile north at Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, Mumbai's monumental colonial-era train station, two gunmen in dark T-shirts and hauling heavy backpacks walked down Platform 13, which opens into a large hall fringed by Re-Fresh Food Plaza, a fast-food outlet.</p>

<p>Throwing a hand grenade into the crowd of travelers, they unloaded volleys of gunfire. Bullets flew through the window where the station's manager, D.P. Chaudhari, observed the hall; he ducked down and survived. A colleague, S.K. Sharma, was cut down as he crossed the concourse. One bullet lodged in the stomach of Re-Fresh Plaza manager Mukesh Aggarwal. The gunmen peppered a bookstand at the back of the hall with bullets, shattering the glass next to a copy of "Complete Wellbeing" magazine, according to vendor Sarman Lal, who quivered on the floor saying his last prayers.</p>

<p>The two gunmen moved along two separate paths toward the station's main entrance, firing as they walked. They met virtually no resistance, even though several dozen police officers are usually deployed at the station. "They were killing the public, and the police just ran away," says Ram Vir, a coffee vendor whose stand is near Platform 8.</p>

<p>B.S. Sidhu, head of the Railway Protection Force for the Mumbai region says that, while some officers tried to fight back, there was little his force could do. Most police officers at the station -- as they are throughout India -- were unarmed or carried only bamboo sticks known as lathis. More than 40 people, including three police officers, were killed in just a few minutes, authorities said. The wounded survivors screamed for help amid acrid smoke, piles of slumped, bloodied bodies and spilling suitcases.</p>

<p>By then, shooting had begun in two other spots: Mumbai's most luxurious hotels, symbols of the city's prosperity that were packed with tourists, visiting executives, and the local elite out for dinner. The historic Taj Mahal Palace & Tower and a complex housing both the Oberoi and Trident hotels rise high above the sea on opposite sides of the southern tip of Mumbai.</p>

<p>At about 9:45 p.m., two gunmen, slender and in their mid-20s, ran up the circular driveway at the entrance to the Trident. They shot the security guard and two bellhops. The hotel had metal detectors, but none of its security personnel carried weapons because of the difficulties in obtaining gun permits from the Indian government, according to the hotel company's chairman, P.R.S. Oberoi. The gunmen raced through the marble-floored lobby, past the grand piano into the adjoining Verandah restaurant, firing at the guests and shattering the glass windows.</p>

<p>At the end of the lobby, they burst into a bar called the Opium Den, shooting dead a hotel staff member. Then they ran after a group of guests who tried to escape through a rear service area. They killed them, too.</p>

<p>The gunmen returned to the Verandah, climbed a staircase, dashed down a corridor lined with jewelry and clothes shops, and stopped in front of the glass doors of Tiffin Restaurant, a swanky restaurant with a sushi bar in the Oberoi hotel.</p>

<p>They killed four of six friends who live in south Mumbai and had just settled down at a table near the front door. One member of the group, a mother of two, threw herself to the ground and shut her eyes, pretending to be dead. The men circled the restaurant, firing at point blank range into anyone who moved before rushing upstairs to an Indian restaurant called Kandahar.</p>

<p>Restaurant workers there ushered guests closest to the kitchen inside. The assailants jumped in front of another group that tried to run out the door. "Stop," they shouted in Hindi. They corralled 16 diners and led them up to the 20th floor. One man in the group dialed his wife in London and told her he'd been taken hostage but was OK. "Everybody drop your phones," one of the assailants shouted, apparently overhearing. Phones clattered to the floor as the three women and 13 men dug through their purses and pockets and obeyed.</p>

<p>On the 20th floor, the gunmen shoved the group out of the stairwell. They lined up the 13 men and three women and lifted their weapons. "Why are you doing this to us?" a man called out. "We haven't done anything to you."</p>

<p>"Remember Babri Masjid?" one of the gunmen shouted, referring to a 16th-century mosque built by India's first Mughal Muslim emperor and destroyed by Hindu radicals in 1992. "Remember Godhra?" the second attacker asked, a reference to the town in the Indian state of Gujarat where religious rioting that evolved into an anti-Muslim pogrom began in 2002.</p>

<p>"We are Turkish. We are Muslim," someone in the group screamed. One of the gunmen motioned for two Turks in the group to step aside.</p>

<p>Then they pointed their weapons at the rest and squeezed the triggers.</p>

<p>A few minutes later they walked upstairs to the terrace. Unbeknown to the terrorists, four of the men were still alive; one of the survivors later provided the account of the shooting to The Wall Street Journal.</p>

<p> At the vaunted Taj Hotel across the peninsula, two terrorists arrived from their attack on Cafe Leopold by about 9:45 p.m., broke down a side door and entered the building, according to a police officer investigating the attacks.</p>

<p>Two others entered the hotel's modern lobby, opened fire and threw grenades. As guests dashed for cover, the two pairs united. They would keep Indian police and commandos at bay for another 60 hours as they rampaged through the building.<br />
Uptown, the two gunmen who had attacked the train station -- recorded by the station's surveillance cameras, according to authorities -- reached the nearby Cama Hospital for women and children, shooting dead two unarmed guards at the entrance and racing up the stairs. By then, news of the attacks had spread in the neighborhood. A number of policemen ran into the hospital as nurses herded expectant mothers into one room and locked themselves inside, a duty doctor says.</p>

<p>On the top floor, the terrorists and the police traded fire near a poster that reads "Mother's Milk is Best for Babies." The policemen were badly outgunned. The gunmen killed one officer and escaped down the stairs, into a narrow alley that separates Cama Hospital from another hospital called GT.</p>

<p>In the alley, the state of Maharashtra's antiterrorism chief, Hemant Karkare, sat in a police SUV packed with fellow officers, trying to coordinate a response to the mayhem engulfing the city. Creeping up, the two militants sprayed the vehicle with gunfire.<br />
The officers appear to have died before any of them had a chance to fire back. The wall and metal blinds behind the van's spot are riddled with bullets. Not a single bullet mark could be seen by a reporter in the area from which the terrorists fired.</p>

<p>Dumping three of the officers' bodies on the ground and taking the others with them, the two militants jumped into the SUV and sped towards the Metro Big Cinemas multiplex. As they passed a crowd of journalists and onlookers, the SUV slowed down, a gun barrel emerged from the window, and bullets started to fly. Then, the vehicle sped on, with another police vehicle in hot pursuit. At one point, the gunmen ditched the SUV and hijacked a Skoda, police said, cruising through southern Mumbai -- possibly looking for an escape route. Two hours later, they ran into a large police roadblock erected on a key road leading out of south Mumbai, at Chowpatty Beach.</p>

<p>Skidding to a halt 30 feet away from the roadblock, the Skoda's driver blinded the police with high beams and, flipping wipers, began spraying fluid on the windshield so that officers couldn't see into the car, said sub-inspector Bhaskar Kadam, one of the officers manning the roadblock.</p>

<p>The three policemen armed with guns drew them. The nine others waved their bamboo sticks. Revving the engine, the car tried to U-turn but got stuck on the median. The man in the passenger seat rolled out and started shooting, killing one officer and wounding another. The surviving baton-wielding officers jumped on him, knocking him unconscious. Policemen with guns shot the driver dead.</p>

<p>This pair's killing spree was over. Police later identified the gunman taken alive as Mr. Qasab, from the Punjab region of Pakistan, who they say is providing details of the plot.<br />
Back at the Taj Mahal Palace, staff members had been calling room after room, advising hundreds of guests to lock the doors, switch off all the lights, and hide, guests and staffers said.</p>

<p>At about 11 p.m., K.R. Ramamoorthy, the 69-year-old nonexecutive chairman of ING Visya Bank, heard men in the corridor knock on his sixth-floor room, he says. "Room service," one of them called out in English.</p>

<p>Silence.</p>

<p>"Shoe polish," the same voice called out.</p>

<p>Mr. Ramamoorthy moved to the bathroom, accidentally banging the door. The two gunmen blasted the room door's lock open and entered. They tied Mr. Ramamoorthy's hands and feet, he says, using his long Indian top known as a kurta, and his pajama bottoms. Then they ordered him to kneel on the ground. "I'm 69 years old. I have high-blood pressure. Please let me go," he recalls begging.</p>

<p>"We'll leave you, we'll let you go," one of the men replied, he says. They turned him over so he lay face down on the floor.</p>

<p>Over the next hour or two, the two men spoke on their mobile phones in his room, seeming relaxed and happy, Mr. Ramamoorthy says. He couldn't tell much of what they said but made out the word "grenade" several times, he says. They ate some snacks from the minibar. Then, two more gunmen showed up in the room, dragging four other hostages -- all uniformed hotel staff.</p>

<p>"What are your names and occupations?" the men asked the five hostages.</p>

<p>"I am Ramamoorthy from Bangalore," Mr. Ramamoorthy says he replied.</p>

<p>"What is your work?" one of the assailants asked in Hindi.</p>

<p>"I am a teacher," he replied.</p>

<p>"No way can a teacher afford to stay here," shouted the gunman, he recalls. "You better tell us the truth."</p>

<p>"I work for a bank," Mr. Ramamoorthy admitted.</p>

<p>The assailants were distracted by calls on their mobile phones. Minutes later, pushing the five hostages in front of them, the gunmen descended the staircase to a fifth-floor room. They shoved the hostages inside, lay them face down on the floor, and left.</p>

<p>Mr. Ramamoorthy says he managed to free his hands and untied the others. By now, a fire possibly started by a grenade explosion was spreading through the sixth floor of the Taj hotel. As the choking smoke from the blazing fire enveloped the room, one of the four hotel staffers ripped off curtains and bedsheets, creating an improvised rope. The staffers used the rope to shimmy down the balcony outside to the third-floor ledge.</p>

<p>Certain he didn't have the physical strength to follow suit, Mr. Ramamoorthy backtracked and descended via the smoke-filled staircase to the third floor. Some time later, he noticed the glare of searchlights. He opened the window and waved and shouted. Firefighters saw him and lifted a ladder to the window. "You are safe," he says they told him. He looked at his watch. It was 6 a.m. Thursday morning.</p>

<p>As the fires set by the militants burned through the hotel during the night, the general manager, Karimbir Kang, was busy shepherding hotel residents like Mr. Ramamoorthy to safety. He didn't manage to rescue his wife, Neeti, and two young children: They died in the blaze.</p>

<p>In the second hotel complex taken over by the militants, the Oberoi-Trident, gunmen returned to the 20th floor at around 6 a.m. Thursday. They pulled out their mobile phones and filmed the sprawled bodies of executed diners. The four injured men who survived the firing line there -- one squashed under two bodies -- were still playing dead, trying not to move.</p>

<p>"We'll booby-trap the bodies with bombs," one of the gunmen said into the phone. As soon as the two terrorists left, the four injured men crept out to a terrace and hid behind a cooling tower, says one of the men. For more than 24 hours, they didn't move from their hiding place, drinking small amounts of red liquid inside the cooling system to soothe their thirst, the man says.</p>

<p>Authorities had asked the Mumbai-based Marine Commandos to help at the Taj in the first hours after the takeover of the hotels. But the so-called MarCos struggled to figure out the entrances and exits in the hotel and found it hard to match the gunmen who moved with ease through the building and seemed to know the structure inside out. The gunmen also were accustomed to operating in darkness, a commander on the force said.</p>

<p>At 6.30 a.m. Thursday, commandos from India's National Security Guard finally arrived -- after they first waited for hours while authorities located a plane to pick them up at New Delhi, then waited for transportation from Mumbai's airport to the hotels under attack. The NSG commandos had proper equipment and training. They surrounded both the Taj and the Oberoi complex and a prolonged siege began.</p>

<p>The terrorists moved frequently through both buildings to confuse their pursuers and create the impression of greater numbers. Still, two of them found time on Thursday to call a local TV station to rant about India's mistreatment of Muslims.</p>

<p>As the fighting went on, new fires broke out at both the Taj and the Oberoi in the evening, sending plumes of smoke into the sky. "Every time the terrorists were in a corner and under stress...they set fire to the curtains," said J.K. Dutt, director general of the NSG.</p>

<p>By Friday morning, the NSG began to achieve real progress. At roughly 9 a.m. that day, Bill Bakshi heard a knock on his 19th-floor room in the annex section of the Taj. A diabetic who was running low on insulin, he peeked through the eyehole in hope of rescue and saw three uniformed men with assault rifles, he says. "They wouldn't say who they were," says Mr. Bakshi, a 63-year-old who owns a textile company. "They were scared, too -- they didn't know who was inside, either."</p>

<p>Mr. Bakshi opened the door. The next thing he knew, he says, he had three gun barrels thrust in his face. It took a couple minutes to convince the NSG men that he was not a terrorist, he says.</p>

<p>By late Friday morning, the NSG cleared out the annex section of the Taj, freeing hostages there. It also succeeded in storming the Oberoi, killing one gunman in a corridor and another in a bedroom. As they combed the hotel room by room, bringing out to safety the four injured men hiding behind the cooling system, the commandos found 32 other bodies inside.</p>

<p>At the Taj and the besieged Chabad House, the fighting continued. Two militants holed up inside the Jewish center had blown off the doors of the elevator on every floor, and used the shaft to hide whenever NSG commandos fired back.</p>

<p>It appears that they executed their hostages one by one as the commandos closed in. Two young women guests, their wrists tied with white plastic rope, lay on the same bed, bullet holes in their heads, according to a photograph taken later at the scene. The terrorists shot Rabbi Holtzberg and his wife, who fell next to each other. As darkness fell, NSG commandos blasted a wall with explosives and finally penetrated the building. They killed the gunmen.</p>

<p>At the Taj, the battle raged into Friday night, with one of the gunmen opening fire from a window and shooting at the hundreds of journalists who gathered to cover the siege on the plaza outside. None were hit.</p>

<p>By Saturday morning, however, the commandos had taken over most of the building. The surviving three terrorists were cornered in a restaurant. The commandos decided to set a fire to smoke the gunmen into the open. Two were shot dead. The third was hit with bullets as he tumbled backwards out of a window and onto the plaza outside. "After that," said Mr. Dutt, the NSG chief, "There was no more shooting."</blockquote></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>HOW TO REALLY SAVE THE AMERICAN AUTO INDUSTRY</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/-a-real-bailout-for.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.594</id>

    <published>2008-12-01T15:24:51Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T17:43:23Z</updated>

    <summary>So the Big Three auto executives will troop into Congress tomorrow armed with spiffy new plans they will never be able to implement. Should Congress pour yet more money down a bottomless pit? A special approach to bankruptcy to take...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Bailout" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="auto" label="AUTO" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bankruptcy" label="BANKRUPTCY" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bigthree" label="BIG THREE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>So the Big Three auto executives will troop into Congress tomorrow armed with spiffy new plans they will never be able to implement.  Should Congress pour yet more money down a bottomless pit?</p>

<p>A special approach to bankruptcy to take account of the needs of continuing financing diffiiculties and warranties along with a drastic overhaul of unsustainable costs could be the best way of saving the American car industry and as many jobs as possible at the Big Three and all the suppliers they work with.</p>

<blockquote><big><strong>A Real Bailout for Auto Makers </strong></big>

<p>By JAY PALMER<br />
November 29, 2008<br />
Barron's</p>

<p>Detroit's only hope may be to let ailing auto makers file for prepackaged bankruptcy. <br />
  <br />
IS A BANKRUPTCY THE BEST OPTION FOR GENERAL MOTORS, Chrysler and Ford ? While their CEOs insist otherwise and the risks would be high, a growing chorus of outsiders says yes. "It's the only real option that would allow GM to take the steps necessary for its long-term survival," asserts John Casesa, managing partner of New York's Casesa Strategic Advisors.<br />
 <br />
Unless the companies solve their problems, they're hurtling toward an ignominious fate: liquidation.  </blockquote></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote>Although hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer funds have been poured into Wall Street firms in recent months, and just last week the Treasury invested $20 billion to keep Citigroup afloat, Congress is wary of helping the car makers. Unlike the banks, Detroit has a problem that isn't just a short-term liquidity squeeze. Rather, it is a business model whose flaws have been made starkly evident by the terrible industrywide sales slump, the weak economy and the credit squeeze.

<p>"We're in probably the worst economic situation that the industry has ever been in," Ford CEO Alan Mulally told Congress last month. "Our sales for the industry, for the first nine months, are down nearly 45%. And the actual sales for October are the lowest for the industry in over 25 years." And November's probably weren't much better. Unless sales suddenly recover, General Motors (ticker: GM) could run out of money by year's end. Chrysler and Ford (F) can hang on longer, but they, too, will exhaust their existing cash reserves, probably by mid-summer and next fall, respectively. To survive until the end of 2009, GM would need $100 billion, unless sales sharply revived.</p>

<p>WITH THAT THREAT IN THE AIR, Congress gave the Detroit Three about 10 days to prove their case for immediate aid, and come up with road maps for survival. "Unless they show us a plan," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said recently, "we cannot show them the money." The companies' responses are due Tuesday. If they don't sway Congress, GM could be forced into bankruptcy quicker than you can say President Obama.</p>

<p>"In the circumstances," says Casesa, "the best the auto makers can hope as a Christmas present this year is that Congress approves a much smaller-than-requested aid package, enough to kick the can into the Obama administration's court."</p>

<p>The recovery plan certainly will look and sound good. It will be full of plant closings, layoffs, glitzy promises that new cars like the plug-in hybrid Volt will make a difference -- and, we suspect, a few executive pay cuts and corporate-jet sales. But if Congress plays Scrooge, what really would happen?</p>

<p>GM CEO Rick Wagoner spoke of a "catastrophic collapse." And Chrysler boss Robert Nardelli warned that the fallout would include "2.3 million-to-3 million in lost jobs [at the car makers, dealers, suppliers and associated businesses], $265 billion-to-$400 billion in lost wages and $100 billion-to-$150 billion in lost government [tax] revenue."</p>

<p>Proponents of a filing say that the companies would get the bankruptcy courts' blessing to trim labor costs, change work rules, revise health-care and pension benefits (related column), trim their dealer networks, shrink their North American operations quickly and do other things that could lead them back to profitability.</p>

<p>BUT WHAT FORM WOULD A BANKRUPTCY TAKE? The one most talked about is Chapter 11, used by many ailing airlines to get protection from creditors while reorganizing.</p>

<p>The problem: A bankrupt company typically borrows the operational funds it needs to keep going. But in the current credit crunch, getting loans might be impossible -- unless Uncle Sam guarantees them or actually makes them, in return for stakes in the companies. The guarantees, which probably would have to be at least as big as the $25 billion the car makers have sought as outright aid, would have to extend to dealers and perhaps suppliers, too, because many would swiftly fold without the credit lines needed to run their operations.</p>

<p>Absent operational funds, GM, the company that seems most in need of aid, would quickly slide from Chapter 11 into Chapter 7 bankruptcy -- liquidation -- which Casesa rates as a 30% probability. The repercussions would be global, affecting GM's huge operations in Canada and Mexico, Europe, South America, Asia, Australia and Africa. Ultimately, the most attractive bits would be bought by other vehicle makers, but some operations would be closed, eliminating many thousands of jobs abroad, too.</p>

<p>To avoid the risk of liquidation, a third option -- a pre-packaged bankruptcy -- has been mooted. Mark Bane, co-head of bankruptcy operations at the law firm of Ropes & Gray, says that, under such an arrangement, a company goes into bankruptcy with all or most of its survival financing in place. "In GM's case, the government would agree to provide specific aid for a limited period, say, a year," he says. "In that time, and under the protection of the court, GM could begin to restructure its business with a much higher probability of long-term survival." This would go a long way toward reassuring car buyers who might otherwise not want to purchase a vehicle from a bankrupt firm, for fear of not having warranties honored or parts being available -- one of Detroit's arguments against Chapter 11.</p>

<p>The plan needn't even be called a bankruptcy. Term it a financed reorganization, or whatever else might make it sound more palatable to GM's board.</p>

<p>As GM goes, so go Ford and Chrysler. "There is a near-certainty," declares Casesa, "that if GM goes bankrupt, Ford and Chrysler would have to follow suit. Neither could hope to function normally if GM suddenly managed to cut its cost base dramatically. A GM failure, and subsequent cutbacks, would also savage the entire network of auto suppliers -- makers of everything from rear-view mirrors to seats. Many wouldn't survive, and those that did would have to raise prices to make up for lost business. Neither Ford nor Chrysler could survive that."</p>

<p>In a U.S. auto market that has been steadily growing, Detroit's share has been steadily declining, from over 90% in the 1960s to 42.7% now. The slack has been taken up by foreign car makers, especially Japan's Toyota (TM) and Honda (HMC).</p>

<p>Essentially, GM, Ford and Chrysler just aren't making enough cars and light trucks that U.S. customers want to buy -- and haven't for years. Sure, they can point to a growing skein of successes, like the popular Chevrolet Malibu and Cadillac CTS and the Ford Focus and Fusion. But these are exceptions; they still have a long way to go.</p>

<p>Developing new products is costly. And the Big Three's union workers still earn an average of just over $70 an hour, compared with about $40 for Toyota and Honda's U.S.-based nonunion employees.</p>

<p>GM, Ford and Chrysler also have all been in business in the U.S. for so much longer than their foreign rivals that they carry a much heftier burden of health-care and pension benefits paid to retirees and their families. That alone adds about $2,000 to the cost of each GM vehicle made. On top of this, labor relations are so out of whack that GM even pays some 8,000 workers a full salary to stay at home. And it still has too many bureaucrats and managers.</p>

<p>No plan created in 10 days can adequately address these fundamental flaws. But it's clear that, to thrive long-term, GM must cut costs, come out with attractive products and shrink its operations and its dealership network to a size appropriate for its reduced market share. The surgery must be savage and sweeping.</p>

<p>Under a prepackaged Chapter 11 bankruptcy, everyone would have to share the pain. Executive pay and benefits would have to be reduced. Top managers should be required to invest a portion of their net worth in warrants or options exercisable when the company emerges from bankruptcy. Uncle Sam could force the companies' brass to accept such conditions, in return for the bankruptcy financing.</p>

<p>GM would have to close as many as 14 of its 29 U.S. plants, and lay off maybe 50% of its remaining 60,000 hourly workers (19,000 signed up for buyouts earlier this year). It would also have to trim its lineup of brands. Chevrolet and Cadillac are both valuable. While Buick has a fuddy-duddy image in the U.S., it remains a hot brand in China, and should be retained for that reason. Also worth keeping are Opel and maybe Vauxhall in Europe, Holden in Australia and GMDaewoo in Korea. These units help GM develop vehicles that generally have made it a winner outside its home market.</p>

<p>The rest would have to disappear, starting with Saturn, which has never in its almost three-decade existence earned a penny for GM. Saab, Pontiac, Hummer and GMC (whose trucks essentially are just Chevrolets with different sheet metal) would also go on the block.</p>

<p>Eliminating these five brands and shutting their dealerships could cut GM costs by more than $9 billion annually, according to Deutsche Bank analyst Rod Lache. For their part, in bankruptcy, Ford would certainly shutter Mercury; and Chrysler, everything but Jeep, its only brand of significant value, and maybe its minivan operations. In fact, a much-slimmed-down Chrysler would probably have to become part of GM, Ford or some foreign car-producer.</p>

<p>Who would want to buy the jettisoned operations, and what would they be worth?</p>

<p>The Bottom Line</p>

<p>A prepackaged Chapter 11 filing, with financing guaranteed by the U.S., is the best hope for GM and Ford. Chrysler would have to become part of one of them, or of another company."Two years ago, we could have estimated a fair value," says Casesa, "but in today's grim market, that's impossible. Remember, most of these are not complete businesses with dedicated engineering and the rest, but just plants, a brand and a distribution network. The only possible buyers would be a foreign car maker, say a Chinese company, looking for a brand foothold in the U.S. But they couldn't afford to pay much." Private-equity outfits, who've seen how Cerberus shot itself in the foot by buying control of Chrysler from Germany's Daimler last year, are unlikely to bid for anything except at the most rock-bottom prices.</p>

<p>If what's good for GM is good for the economy, then the reverse also applies. The collapse of GM alone would cost the government as much as $200 billion should the biggest U.S. auto maker be forced to liquidate, estimates Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS Global Insight. A GM failure would mean "more aid to specific states like Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana, and more money into unemployment and extended benefits." And it would worsen the home-foreclosure rate, making it more difficult to revive the economy.</p>

<p>In the end, a prepackaged bankruptcy would be risky and scary. But so is a bypass operation for a heart patient in imminent danger of dying.</blockquote></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>THE GREAT ENERGY DELUSION</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/the-great-energy-delusion.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.592</id>

    <published>2008-12-01T14:32:37Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T15:16:43Z</updated>

    <summary>The key point: Al Gore and Barack Obama have great ambitions for conversion of existing energy sources to green ones: Gore wants all electricity to be powered by wind and solar in a decade. Obama wants our use of oil...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Climate Change" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="climatechange" label="CLIMATE CHANGE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="energy" label="ENERGY" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="globalwarming" label="GLOBAL WARMING" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="green" label="GREEN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The key point:</p>

<p>Al Gore and Barack Obama have great ambitions for conversion of existing energy sources to green ones:  Gore wants all electricity to be powered by wind and solar in a decade.  Obama wants our use of oil to end in ten years.</p>

<p>Delusional, our author says:</p>

<blockquote>The historical verdict is unassailable: because of the requisite technical and infrastructural imperatives and because of numerous (and often entirely unforeseen) socio-economic adjustments, energy transitions in large economies and on a global scale are inherently protracted affairs. 

<p>That is why, barring some extraordinary commitments and actions, none of the promises for greatly accelerated energy transitions will be realized, and during the next decade none of the new energy sources and prime movers will make a major difference by capturing 20 percent to 25 percent of its respective market. </p>

<p>A world without fossil fuel combustion is highly desirable and, to be optimistic, our collective determination, commitment, and persistence could accelerate its arrival—but getting there will demand not only high cost but also considerable patience: coming energy transitions will unfold across decades, not years.</blockquote></p>

<p>Unfortunately, this delusion and another one, the unproven assumption that human activity is having a significant impact on the earth’s climate, will be driving our political leaders into making expensive mistakes that will harm the national security.</p>

<p>The nation should have as a goal becoming independent of hostile and unstable producers of energy as soon as possible.  The quickest way to that end is developing the energy resources of this country – offshore, in the Rocky Mountains’ shale, in Alaska.  And all of this can be done by job-creating American companies with more environmental sensitivity than will be done in energy development almost anywhere else in the world.   Ten years from now the  world will be using more oil, not less, and certainly it will not be an oil-free world.  To the extent elected delusionists prevent the United States from developing our own resources, they are adding to global pollution – in waters, on land and in the air as well as handicapping our drive to national security independence from overseas energy suppliers. </p>

<p>Pouring all money into "acceptable clean" energy development puts the goal of energy independence off longer and does not take utilize the obvious advantages we have, such as the world's largest repository of coal.  Furthermore, switching to alternatives to coal, oil and natural gas will require enormous additional investment in infrastructure and the junking of trillions of dollars of investment already made.  The nation needs to consider carefully the effects on our economy and national security before embracing  costly, unproven assumptions that will lead to little if any good and probably do great harm.</p>

<p>As for what cannot be done in a decade or two, consider this.  <blockquote><a href="http://www.american.com/archive/2008/november-december-magazine/moore2019s-curse-and-the-great-energy-delusion"><br />
<big><strong>Moore's Curse and the Great Energy Delusion</strong></big></a></p>

<p>By Vaclav Smil From The American (A Magazine): Wednesday, November 19, 2008 </p>

<p>Our transition away from fossil fuels will take decades—if it happens at all.<br />
 <br />
During the early 1970s we were told by the promoters of nuclear energy that by the year 2000 America’s coal-based electricity generation plants would be relics of the past and that all electricity would come from nuclear fission. What’s more, we were told that the first generation fission reactors would by then be on their way out, replaced by super-efficient breeder reactors that would produce more fuel than they were initially charged with.</p>

<p>During the early 1980s some aficionados of small-scale, distributed, “soft” (today’s “green”) energies saw America of the first decade of the 21st century drawing 30 percent to 50 percent of its energy use from renewables (solar,wind, biofuels). For the past three decades we have been told how natural gas will become the most important source of modern energy: widely cited forecasts of the early 1980s had the world deriving half of its energy from natural gas by 2000. And a decade ago the promoters of fuel cell cars were telling us that such vehicles would by now be on the road in large numbers, well on their way to displacing ancient and inefficient internal combustion engines.</p>

<p>These are the realities of 2008: coal-fired power plants produce half of all U.S. electricity, nuclear stations 20 percent, and there is not a single commercial breeder reactor operating anywhere in the world; in 2007 the United States derives about 1.7 percent of its energy from new renewable conversions (corn-based ethanol, wind, photovoltaic solar, geothermal); natural gas supplies about 24 percent of the world’s commercial energy—less than half the share predicted in the early 1980s and still less than coal with nearly 29 percent; and there are no fuel-cell cars.</blockquote></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote>This list of contrasts could be greatly extended, but the point is made: all of these forecasts and anticipations failed miserably because their authors and promoters ignored one of the most important realities ruling the behavior of complex energy systems—the inherently slow pace of energy transitions.

<p><strong>It is delusional to think that the United States can install in 10 years wind and solar generating capacity equivalent to that of thermal power plants that took nearly 60 years to construct.</strong></p>

<p>“Energy transitions” encompass the time that elapses between an introduction of a new primary energy source oil, nuclear electricity, wind captured by large turbines) and its rise to claiming a substantial share (20 percent to 30 percent) of the overall market, or even to becoming the single largest contributor or an absolute leader (with more than 50 percent) in national or global energy supply. The term also refers to gradual diffusion of new prime movers, devices that replaced animal and human muscles by converting primary energies into mechanical power that is used to rotate massive turbogenerators producing electricity or to propel fleets of vehicles, ships, and airplanes. There is one thing all energy transitions have in common: they are prolonged affairs that take decades to accomplish, and the greater the scale of prevailing uses and conversions the longer the substitutions will take. The second part of this statement seems to be a truism but it is ignored as often as the first part: otherwise we would not have all those unrealized predicted milestones for new energy sources.</p>

<p>Preindustrial societies had rather simple and fairly stationary patterns of primary energy use. They relied overwhelmingly on biomass fuels (wood, charcoal, straw) for heat and they supplemented their dominant prime movers(muscles) with wind to sail ships and in some regions with windmills and small waterwheels. This traditional arrangement prevailed in Europe and the Americas until the beginning of the 19th century, and it dominated most of Asia and Africa until the middle of the 20th century. The year 1882 was likely the tipping point of the transition to fossil fuels, the time when the United States first burned more coal than wood. The best available historical reconstructions indicate that it was only sometime during the late 1890s that the energy content of global fossil fuel consumption, nearly all of it coal, came to equal the energy content of wood, charcoal, and crop residues.</p>

<p>The Western world then rapidly increased its reliance on fossil fuels and hydroelectricity, but in large parts of Africa and Asia the grand energy transition from traditional biomass fuels to fossil fuels has yet to be completed. Looking only at modern primary energies on a global scale, coal receded from about 95 percent of the total energy supply in 1900 to about 60 percent by 1950 and less than 24 percent by 2000. But coal’s importance continued to rise in absolute terms, and in 2001 it even began to regain some of its relative importance. As a result, coal is now relatively more important in 2008 (nearly 29 percent of primary energy) than it was at the time of the first energy “crisis” in 1973 (about 27 percent). And in absolute terms it now supplies twice as much energy as it did in 1973: the world has been returning to coal rather than leaving it behind.</p>

<p><strong>These are the realities of 2008: coal-fired power plants produce 50 percent of U.S. electricity, nuclear stations 20 percent, and there are no operating commercial breeder reactors.</strong></p>

<p>Although oil became the largest contributor to the world’s commercial energy supply in 1965 and its share reached 48 percent by 1973, its relative importance then began to decline and in 2008 it will claim less than 37 percent of the total. Moreover, worldwide coal extraction during the 20th century contained more energy than any other fuel, edging out oil by about 5 percent. The common perception that the 19th century was dominated by coal and the 20th century by oil is wrong: in global terms, the 19th century was still a part of the millennia-long wooden era and 20th century was, albeit by a small margin, the coal century. And while many African and Asian countries use no coal, the fuel remains indispensable: it generates 40 percent of the world’s electricity, nearly 80 percent of all energy in South Africa (that continent’s most industrialized nation), 70 percent of China’s, and about 50 percent of India’s.</p>

<p>The pace of the global transition from coal to oil can be judged from the following spans: it took oil about 50 years since the beginning of its commercial production during the 1860s to capture 10 percent of the global primary energy market, and then almost exactly 30 years to go from 10 percent to about 25 percent of the total. Analogical spans for natural gas are almost identical: approximately 50 years and 40 years. Regarding electricity, hydrogeneration began in 1882, the same year as Edison’s coal-fired generation, and just before World War I water power produced about 50 percent of the world’s electricity; subsequent expansion of absolute production could not prevent a large decline in water’s relative contribution to about 17 percent in 2008. Nuclear fission reached 10 percent of global electricity generation 27 years after the commissioning of the first nuclear power plant in 1956, and its share is now roughly the same as that of hydropower.</p>

<p>These spans should be kept in mind when appraising potential rates of market penetration by nonconventional fossilfuels or by renewable energies. No less important is the fact that none of these alternatives has yet reached even 5 percent of its respective global market. Nonconventional oil, mainly from Alberta oil sands and from Venezuelan tar deposits, now supplies only about 3 percent of the world’s crude oil and only about 1 percent of all primary energy. Renewable conversions—mainly liquid biofuels from Brazil, the United States, and Europe, and wind-powered electricity generation in Europe and North America, with much smaller contributions from geothermal and photovoltaic solar electricity generation—now provide about 0.5 percent of the world’s primary commercial energy, and in 2007 wind generated merely 1 percent of all electricity.</p>

<p>The absolute quantities needed to capture a significant share of the market, say 25 percent, are huge because the scale of the coming global energy transition is of an unprecedented magnitude. By the late 1890s, when combustion of coal (and some oil) surpassed the burning of wood, charcoal, and straw, these resources supplied annually an equivalent of about half a billion tons of oil. Today, replacing only half of worldwide annual fossil fuel use with renewable energies would require the equivalent of about 4.5 billion tons of oil. That’s a task equal to creating de novo an energy industry with an output surpassing that of the entire world oil industry—an industry that has taken more than a century to build.</p>

<p>The scale of transition needed for electricity generation is perhaps best illustrated by deconstructing Al Gore’s July 2008 proposal to “re-power” America: “Today I challenge our nation to commit to producing 100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and truly clean carbon-free sources within 10 years. This goal is achievable, affordable, and transformative.”</p>

<p><strong>Nuclear fission reached 10 percent of global electricity generation 27 years after the commissioning of the first nuclear power plant.</strong></p>

<p>Let’s see. In 2007 the country had about 870 gigawatts (GW) of electricity-generating capacity in fossil-fueled and nuclear stations, the two nonrenewable forms of generation that Gore wants to replace in their entirety. On average, these thermal power stations are at work about 50 percent of the time and hence they generated about 3.8 PWh (that is, 3.8 x 1015 watt-hours) of electricity in 2007. In contrast, wind turbines work on average only about 23 percent of the time, which means that even with all the requisite new high-voltage interconnections, slightly more than two units of wind-generating capacity would be needed to replace a unit in coal, gas, oil, and nuclear plants. And even if such an enormous capacity addition—in excess of 1,000 GW—could be accomplished in a single decade (since the year 2000, actual additions in all plants have averaged less than 30 GW/year!), the financial cost would be enormous: it would mean writing off the entire fossil-fuel and nuclear generation industry, an enterprise whose power plants alone have a replacement value of at least $1.5 trillion (assuming at least $1,700/installed kW), and spending at least $2.5 trillion to build the new capacity.</p>

<p>But because those new plants would have to be in areas that are not currently linked with high-voltage (HV) transmission lines to major consumption centers (wind from the Great Plains to the East and West coasts,  photovoltaic solar from the Southwest to the rest of the country), that proposal would also require a rewiring of the country. Limited transmission capacity to move electricity eastward and westward from what is to be the new power center in the Southwest, Texas, and the Midwest is already delaying new wind projects even as wind generates less than 1 percent of all electricity. The United States has about 165,000 miles of HV lines, and at least 40,000 additional miles of new high-capacity lines would be needed to rewire the nation, at a cost of close to $100 billion. And the costs are bound to escalate, because the regulatory approval process required before beginning a new line construction can take many years. To think that the United States can install in 10 years wind and solar generating capacity equivalent to that of thermal power plants that took nearly 60 years to construct is delusional.</p>

<p>And energy transitions from established prime movers to new converters also take place across time spans measured in decades, not in a decade. Steam engines, whose large-scale commercial diffusion began with James Watt’s improved design introduced during the 1770s, remained important into the middle of the 20th century. There is no more convincing example of their endurance than the case of Liberty ships, the “ships that won the war” as they carried American materiel and troops to Europe and Asia between 1942 and 1945. Rudolf Diesel began to develop his highly efficient internal combustion engine in 1892 and his prototype engine was ready by 1897. The first small ship engines were installed on river-going vessels in 1903, and the first oceangoing ship with Diesel engines was launched in 1911. By 1939 a quarter of the world’s merchant fleet was propelled by these engines and virtually every new freighter had them. But nearly 3,000 Liberty ships were still powered by oil-fired steam engines. And steam locomotives disappeared from American railroads only by the late 1950s, while in China and India they were indispensable even during the 1980s.</p>

<p><strong>A decade ago the promoters of fuel-cell cars were telling us that such vehicles would by now be on the road in large numbers.</strong></p>

<p>Automobilization offers similar examples of gradual diffusion, and the adoption of automotive diesel engines is another excellent proof of slow transition. The gasoline-fueled internal combustion engine—the most important transportation prime mover of the modern world—was first deployed by Benz, Maybach, and Daimler during the mid-1880s, and it reached a remarkable maturity in a single generation after its introduction (Ford’s Model T in 1908).</p>

<p>But massive automobilization swept the United States only during the 1920s and Europe and Japan only during the 1960s, a process amounting to spans of at least 30 to 40 years in the U.S. case and 70 to 80 years in the European case between the initial introduction and decisive market conquest (with more than half of all families having a car). The first diesel-powered car (Mercedes-Benz 260D) was made in 1936, but it was only during the 1990s that diesels began to claim more than 15 percent of the new car market in major EU countries, and only during this decade that they began to account for more than a third of all newly sold cars. Once again, roughly half a century had to elapse between the initial introduction and significant market penetration.</p>

<p>And despite the fact that diesels have been always inherently more efficient than gasoline-fueled engines (the difference is up to 35 percent) and that modern diesel-powered cars have very low particulate and sulphur emissions, their share of the U.S. car market remains negligible: in 2007 only 3 percent of newly sold cars were diesels.<br />
And it has taken more than half a century for both gasoline- and diesel-fueled internal combustion engines to displace agricultural draft animals in industrialized countries: the U.S. Department of Agriculture stopped counting draft animals only in 1963, and the process is yet to be completed in many low-income nations.</p>

<p>Finally, when asked to name the world’s most important continuously working prime mover, most people would not name the steam turbine. The machine was invented by Charles Parsons in 1884 and it remains fundamentally unchanged 125 years later. Gradual advances in metallurgy made it simply larger and more efficient and these machines now generate more than 70 percent of the world’s electricity in fossil-fueled and nuclear stations (the rest comes from gas and water turbines as well as diesels).<br />
There is no common underlying process to explain the gradual nature of energy transitions. In the case of primary energy supply, the time span needed for significant market penetration is mostly the function of financing, developing, and perfecting necessarily massive and expensive infrastructures. For example, the world oil industry annually handles more than 30 billion barrels, or four billion tons, of liquids and gases; it extracts the fuel in more than 100 countries and its facilities range from self-propelled geophysical exploration rigs to sprawling refineries, and include about 3,000 large tankers and more than 300,000 miles of pipelines. Even if an immediate alternative were available, writing off this colossal infrastructure that took more than a century to build would amount to discarding an investment worth well over $5 trillion—but it is quite obvious that its energy output could not be replicated by any alternative in a decade or two.</p>

<p><strong>Renewable conversions now provide about 0.5 percent of the world’s primary commercial energy, and in 2007 wind generated merely 1 percent of all electricity.</strong></p>

<p>In the case of prime movers, the inertial nature of energy transitions is often due to the reliance on a machine that may be less efficient, such as a steam engine or gasoline-fueled engine, but whose marketing and servicing are well established and whose performance quirks and weaknesses are well known, as opposed to a superior converter that may bring unexpected problems and setbacks. Predictability may, for a long time, outweigh a potentially superior performance, and associated complications (for example, high particulate emissions of early diesels) and new supply-chain requirements (be it sufficient refinery capacity to produce low-sulfur diesel fuel or the availability of filling stations dispensing alternative liquids) may slow down the diffusion of new converters.</p>

<p>All of these are matters of fundamental importance given the energy challenges facing the United States and the world. New promises of rapid shifts in energy sources and new anticipations of early massive gains from the deployment of new conversion techniques create expectations that will not be met and distract us from pursuing real solutions. Unfortunately, there is no shortage of these unrealistic calls, such as the popular claim that America should seek to generate 30 percent of its electricity supply from wind power by 2030.</p>

<p>And now Al Gore is telling us that the United States can completely repower its electricity generation in a single decade! Gore has succumbed to what I call “Moore’s curse.” Moore’s Law describes a long-standing trend in computer processing power, observed by Intel cofounder Gordon Moore, whereby a computer’s power doubles every year and a half. This led Gore to claim that since “the price paid for the same performance came down by 50 percent every 18 months, year after year,” something similar can happen with energy systems.</p>

<p>But the doubling of microprocessor performance every 18 months is an atypically rapid case of technical innovation. It does not represent—as the above examples of prime mover diffusion make clear—the norm of technical advances as far as new energy sources and new prime movers are concerned, and it completely ignores the massive infrastructural needs of new modes of electricity generation.</p>

<p>The historical verdict is unassailable: because of the requisite technical and infrastructural imperatives and because of numerous (and often entirely unforeseen) socio-economic adjustments, energy transitions in large economies and on a global scale are inherently protracted affairs. That is why, barring some extraordinary commitments and actions, none of the promises for greatly accelerated energy transitions will be realized, and during the next decade none of the new energy sources and prime movers will make a major difference by capturing 20 percent to 25 percent of its respective market. A world without fossil fuel combustion is highly desirable and, to be optimistic, our collective determination, commitment, and persistence could accelerate its arrival—but getting there will demand not only high cost but also considerable patience: coming energy transitions will unfold across decades, not years.</p>

<p><em>Vaclav Smil is the author of Energy at the Crossroads and Energy in Nature and Society (MIT Press). He is Distinguished Professor at the University of Manitoba</em>.</blockquote><br />
 </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>DEMOCRATS USE MORE TAXPAYERS&apos; MONEY TO HALT THE FINANCIAL CRISIS THEY TRIGGERED</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/democrats-use-more-taxpayers-money-to-ha.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.591</id>

    <published>2008-12-01T13:42:36Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T17:54:36Z</updated>

    <summary>The fiscal crisis will be on everyone&apos;s minds for quite awhile. The world financial network hangs together because of confidence. What shattered that confidence was the bursting of the housing bubble and the defaults beginning with the subprime loans encouraged,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Democratic Congress" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Democratic Financial Crisis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Taxation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="barneyfrank" label="BARNEY FRANK" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="richpeople" label="RICH PEOPLE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="taxation" label="TAXATION" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The fiscal crisis will be on everyone's minds for quite awhile.</p>

<p>The world financial network hangs together because of confidence.</p>

<p>What shattered that confidence was the bursting of the housing bubble and the defaults beginning with the subprime loans encouraged, indeed, required by Democrats in Congress led by the likes of Massachusetts' own Congressman Barney Frank. Frank and other Democrats also twisted arms at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy the risky loans and package them up and send them around the world with the implicit U.S. guaranty behind them. Frank, the top Democrat in the House of Representatives on financial matters, kept telling concerned Republicans that Fannie and Freddie were in great condition and that no reform or new regulation was needed. Frank convinced fellow Democrats in the Senate this was the case and together they blocked reform legislation in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. </p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/y56lGWvVsrc&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/y56lGWvVsrc&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p>What percent of Massachusetts -- and U.S. -- residents know that Democratic policies and actions cost them 30-50% of their life savings? </p>

<p>"Who blew that hole in your IRA?" Barney Frank. But he wasn't alone.</p>

<p>Of course, the voluble Frank is on the airwaves regularly blaming everyone else but himself and his colleagues, The Democrats in Congress worked hard to get their constituents who couldn't afford homes to get "subprime" (that is, very risky) mortgage loans. They got the loans all right, they got their homes, but when the housing bubble burst their mortgage defaults caused them agony and in many cases the loss of their homes. </p>

<p>The collapse of the subprime market triggered the financial panic that has cost the world trillions and frozen the credit system, leading to job as well as financial losses.<br />
Democrats are now once again hard at work, this time figuring out how much of taxpayers' money will be poured into the black hole they created in the hope they will avert the Depression that their good intentions and bad judgment has hurtling towards us</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u1Mazjm_A5k&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u1Mazjm_A5k&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p>After all, as Frank says, there are plenty of rich people out there to tax.</p>

<p>The whole sorry tale of Democratic responsibility is still being written, but a good start would be <a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=312766781716725">here</a> and <a href="http://www.ibdeditorials.com/series11.aspx">here</a>.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>FROM THEE TO ME TO MINE</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/from-thee-to-me-to-mine.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.590</id>

    <published>2008-12-01T13:32:48Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T13:41:37Z</updated>

    <summary>The president-elect says he wants to &quot;jolt&quot; the economy. Metaphor aside, will it do any good? Professor Thomas Sowell sees the frenzy whipped up by the media as a wonderful opportunity for politicians to spend money on their favorite groups...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="American Values" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Socialism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="The Economy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The president-elect says he wants to "jolt" the economy. Metaphor aside, will it do any good? </p>

<p>Professor Thomas Sowell sees the frenzy whipped up by the media as a wonderful opportunity for politicians to spend money on their favorite groups which they will take away from those who have earned it. Could that be?</p>

<blockquote>What we are talking about is a golden political opportunity for politicians to use the current financial crisis to fundamentally change an economy that has been successful for more than two centuries, so that politicians can henceforth micro-manage all sorts of businesses and play Robin Hood, taking from those who are not likely to vote for them and transferring part of their earnings to those who will vote for them . . . .

<p>No doubt we could all use a few billion dollars every now and then. But the question of who actually gets it will be strictly in the hands of Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. It is one of the few parts of the legacy of the Bush administration that the Democrats are not likely to criticize.</blockquote></p>

<p>Professor Sowell's timely warning is of what looks like a good imitation of totalitarian socialism. But who can stop them?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/sowell112508.php3">Read <big><strong>"Jolting" the Economy</strong></big></a><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AMERICAN ISLAMIC SUPREMACISTS CONVICTED OF FUNDING TERRORISM</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/american-islamic-supremacists-convicted.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.589</id>

    <published>2008-12-01T13:01:07Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T16:16:42Z</updated>

    <summary>War is being waged by Islamic supremacists worldwide. Their goal is to conquer the world. Don&apos;t laugh. They&apos;ve been at it for 1400 years, with much success over the centuries. With the Middle East awash with billions of petrodollars, a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islamic supremacism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="conviction" label="CONVICTION" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="dallas" label="DALLAS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="holylandfoundation" label="HOLY LAND FOUNDATION" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islamicsupremacism" label="ISLAMIC SUPREMACISM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spencer" label="SPENCER" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="stealthjihad" label="STEALTH JIHAD" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>War is being waged by Islamic supremacists worldwide. Their goal is to conquer the world. Don't laugh. They've been at it for 1400 years, with much success over the centuries. With the Middle East awash with billions of petrodollars, a potential support base of 1.3 billion Muslims worldwide, of which an estimated 10-15% are supportive of the supremists' goal, the followers of Mohammad are in the best position to wage war they have been in since 1453.</p>

<p>While they don't currently have military might to attack the U.S. frontally, they can inflict damage through terrorist attacks, as happened on 9/11/2001. The attack of just ten Muslim terrorists in Mumbai is illustrative as well.  Fortunately, since the Bush Administration quickly went on high alert immediately after 9/11 and strengthened national defenses, it has became much more difficult for Islamic forces to launch a major strike in this country. In fact, several significant plots have been thwarted and the nation has been able to protect itself successfully in the years since. </p>

<p>However, there is a quieter offensive underway to weaken our culture to advance the cause of Islamic supremacism that largely escapes notice. One of the foremost experts on Islamic supremacism who is very much focused on Islamic efforts to undermine society is Robert Spencer. He calls this under-the-radar, quiet offensive to establish Islam as the ruler in the U.S. "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Stealth-Jihad-Radical-Subverting-America/dp/1596985569/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1228136696&sr=8-1">Stealth Jihad</a>," which he describes in detail in his book of that name. </p>

<p>Jihad in common parlance means violent war against unbelievers, which, according to Mohammad, is to be unrelenting until victory is achieved. Stealth Jihad is part of that same war, but it is being being waged by non-violent means. Among other things, it involves raising money for "charity," which gets funneled to support terrorist organizations and Islamic fighters in other parts of the world -- as well as Stealth Jihad in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere..</p>

<p>A major victory was won last week in a Dallas courtroom when the Holy Land Foundation and several of its leaders were found guilty of knowingly funding the terrorist organization Hamas in Gaza. During the course of this trial and a prior one it was revealed that the Holy Land Foundation was but one of up to 70 Islamic organizations in a network established by the Muslim Brotherhood to undermine the United States from within with the ultimate goal of replacing the U.S. Constituton with Islamic law, Sharia. To be specific, the goal is to conduct in the United States </p>

<blockquote>"a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."</blockquote>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Islamic organizations that are in the news every day such as the <a href="http://www.investigativeproject.org/profile/172">Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)</a> were named as unindicted co-conspirators during the HLF trial, members of the Muslim Brotherhood network. Yet CAIR has been so successful in its public relations efforts it is sought out by the national media for comments on happenings affecting Muslims and employed by the U.S. government for "sensitivity training" of FBI agents.</p>

<p>After the guilty findings were read out in court, a son of one of the defendants shouted out, "My dad is not a criminal. He's human!" As Robert Spencer observed, </p>

<blockquote>This was one hint of the strategy that the stealth jihadists and their allies will now pursue: to portray these jihadists as martyrs -- a tried-and-true strategy that has been used for decades, going back to the fog of disinformation that for years surrounded that old Communist spy, Alger Hiss.</blockquote>

<p>The defense lawyer made similar remarks aimed at eliciting sympathy from the media for the really innocent Muslims who had been hounded for years by the federal government.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/25/us/25charity.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=elaydi&st=cse">The New York Times</a> sought out the daughter of one of the principal convicted defendants:<br />
<blockquote>Noor Elashi, a 23-year-old writer who is the daughter of Ghassan Elashi, said she was "heartbroken" that jurors had accepted what she called the fear-mongering of the prosecution. </p>

<p>"I am utterly shocked at this outcome," Ms. Elashi said. "This is a truly low point for the United States of America." She said supporters would not rest until the verdict was overturned.</blockquote></p>

<p>And the stealth jihadists' media people were ready to make sure there was an appealing picture of a "victim'" famly that could be carried nationwide, as it was by both the New York Times and the Boston Globe and other gullible news organizations such as the AP:</p>

<p align="center"><img src="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/images/2008/12/HLFConviction.600.jpg" width="450" height="248" alt="HLFConviction.600.jpg"/></p>
<small> Zolfa Elaydi, center, with her children Fidaa, left, and Jihad, reacting to news that the leaders of a Muslim charity had been convicted on Monday in Dallas. (The son's name is "Jihad"?)</small>

<p>Neither the Times nor the Globe carried this statement praising the work of the prosecution:</p>

<blockquote>"This is one of the most significant victories the Justice Department has won in the war on terror," said Andrew McCarthy, who prosecuted blind cleric Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman and 11 others for conspiring to blow up a series of New York landmarks. "Financing is the life-blood of jihadist organizations like Hamas. With the assistance of willing co-conspirators, they conceal their activities and use the Muslim obligation of charitable giving to mask support that is actually channeled to their murderous agenda. Today's verdicts say, loudly and clearly, that Americans aren't fooled and won't tolerate it. As a former federal prosecutor, I am especially proud of the assistant U.S. attorneys who persevered through some real travails in securing justice for the American people."</blockquote>

<p>For a full account of the conviction, read this:</p>

<blockquote><big><strong>Holy Land Foundation Officials Convicted on All Counts</strong></big>
Investigative Project on Terrorism News
November 24, 2008
updated 8:35 p.m
DALLAS.. A jury convicted five former officials at the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) on all counts in the Hamas-support case after 8 days of deliberations.

<p>The men, Shukri Abu-Baker, Ghassan Elashi, Mohamed El-Mezain, Mufid Abdulqader and Abdelrahman Odeh, could face up to 20 years in prison for their convictions on conspiracy counts, including conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. The verdicts, read Monday afternoon, ended a two-year saga in what is considered the largest terror financing case since the 9/11 attacks.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.investigativeproject.org/article/865">more ...</a></blockquote></p>

<p>To read the Times' sympathetic account of the "victims' plight," <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/25/us/25charity.html?scp=2&sq=elaydi&st=cse">click here.</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>GUANTANAMO TO BE CLOSED?  WHERE DO &apos;THEY&apos; GO?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/12/guantanamo-to-be-closed-where-do-they-go.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.593</id>

    <published>2008-12-01T11:48:26Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T17:04:55Z</updated>

    <summary>If President Obama (after January 20) closes Guantanomo, where is he going to put those guys? As everyone but President-elect B. Hussein Obama&apos;s base knows, many of the Guantanamo detainees cannot be sent to their home countries, cannot be released...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islamic supremacism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="afghanistan" label="AFGHANISTAN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="coulter" label="COULTER" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="guantanamo" label="GUANTANAMO" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="terrorist" label="TERRORIST" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>If President Obama (after January 20) closes Guantanomo, where is he going to put those guys?</p>

<blockquote>As everyone but President-elect B. Hussein Obama's base knows, many of the Guantanamo detainees cannot be sent to their home countries, cannot be released and cannot be tried. They need to be held in some form of extra-legal limbo the rest of their lives, sort of like Phil Spector.</blockquote> 

<p>Will we send them all to Afghanistan where they can resume jihad?  Does anyone -- except some nutty judge -- want them released in the United States if no one will take them?</p>

<p>One story illustrates the challenge.</p>

<blockquote>
<a href="http://www.sj-r.com/opinions/x596321695/Ann-Coulter-Guantanamo-detainees-not-exactly-philanthropists">TERRORISTS' RESTLESS LEG SYNDROME<big><strong></strong></big></a>

<p><strong>Guantanamo detainees not exactly philanthropists</strong><br />
by Ann Coulter<br />
November 26, 2008</p>

<p>I thought the rest of the world was going to love us if we elected B. Hussein Obama! Somebody better tell the Indian Muslims. </p>

<p>As everyone but President-elect B. Hussein Obama's base knows, many of the Guantanamo detainees cannot be sent to their home countries, cannot be released and cannot be tried. They need to be held in some form of extra-legal limbo the rest of their lives, sort of like Phil Spector. </p>

<p>And now they're Obama's problem. </blockquote></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<blockquote>If Obama wants his detention of Islamic terrorists to be dramatically different from Bush's Guantanamo, my suggestion is that he cut off -- so to speak -- the expensive prosthetic limb procedures now being granted the detained terrorists. 

<p>Far from being sodomized and tortured by U.S. forces -- as Obama's base has wailed for the past seven years -- the innocent scholars and philanthropists being held at Guantanamo have been given expensive, high-tech medical procedures at taxpayer expense. If we're not careful, multitudes of Muslims will be going to fight Americans in Afghanistan just so they can go to Guantanamo and get proper treatment for attention deficit disorder and erectile dysfunction. </p>

<p>After being captured fighting with Taliban forces against Americans in 2001, Abdullah Massoud was sent to Guantanamo, where the one-legged terrorist was fitted with a special prosthetic leg, at a cost of $50,000-$75,000 to the U.S. taxpayer. Under the Americans With Disabilities Act, Massoud would now be able to park his car bomb in a handicapped parking space! </p>

<p>No, you didn't read that wrong, because the VA won't pay for your new glasses. I said $75,000. I would have gone with hanging at sunrise, but what do I know? </p>

<p>Upon his release in March 2004, Massoud hippity-hopped back to Afghanistan and quickly resumed his war against the U.S. Aided by his new artificial leg, just months later, in October 2004, Massoud masterminded the kidnapping of two Chinese engineers in Pakistan working on the Gomal Zam Dam project. </p>

<p>This proved, to me at least, that people with disabilities can do anything they put their minds to. Way to go, you plucky extremist! </p>

<p>Massoud said he had nothing against the Chinese but wanted to embarrass Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf for cooperating with the Americans. You know, the Americans who had just footed -- you should pardon the expression -- a $75,000 bill for his prosthetic leg. </p>

<p>Pakistani forces stormed Massoud's hideout, killing all the kidnappers, including Massoud. Only one of the Chinese engineers was rescued alive. </p>

<p>As a result of the kidnapping, the Chinese pulled all 100 engineers and dam workers out of Pakistan, and work on the dam ceased. This was bad news for the people of Pakistan -- but good news for the endangered Pakistani snail darter! </p>

<p>In none of the news accounts I read of Massoud's return to jihad after his release from Guantanamo is there any mention of the fact that his prosthetic leg was acquired in Guantanamo, courtesy of American taxpayers after he was captured trying to kill Americans on the battlefield in Afghanistan. </p>

<p>News about the prosthetic leg might interfere with stories of the innocent aid workers being held captive at Guantanamo in George Bush's AmeriKKKa. </p>

<p>To the contrary, although Massoud's swashbuckling reputation as a jihadist with a prosthetic leg appears in many news items, where he got that leg is almost purposely hidden -- even lied about. </p>

<blockquote>"Abdullah Massoud ... had earned both sympathy and reverence for his time in Guantanamo Bay. ... Upon his release, he made it home to Waziristan and resumed his war against the U.S. With his long hair, his prosthetic limb and impassioned speeches, he quickly became a charismatic inspiration to Waziristan's youth." -- The New York Times </blockquote>

<p>He's not a one-legged terrorist -- he's a freedom fighter living with a disability. I think we could all learn something about courage from this man. </p>

<blockquote>"He lost his leg in a landmine explosion a few days before the fall of Kabul to the Taliban in September 1996. It didn't dampen his enthusiasm as a fighter and he got himself an artificial leg later, says Yusufzai."-- The Indo-Asian News Service </blockquote>

<p>Where? At COSTCO? </p>

<blockquote>"The 29-year-old Massoud, who lost his left leg in a landmine explosion while fighting alongside the Taliban, often used to ride a horse or camel because his disability made it painful for him to walk long distances in hilly areas." -- BBC Monitoring South Asia </blockquote>

<p>Side-saddle, I'm guessing. And you just know those caves along the Afghan-Pakistan border aren't wheelchair accessible. </p>

<blockquote>"He was educated in Peshawar and was treated in Karachi after his left leg was blown up in a landmine explosion in the Wreshmin Tangi gorge near Kabul in September 1996. He now walks with an artificial leg specifically made for him in Karachi." -- Gulf News (United Arab Emirates) </blockquote>

<p>Karachi? Hey, how do I get into this guy's HMO? </p>

<p>They can't lick leprosy in Karachi, but the Gulf News tells us Massoud got his artificial leg at one of their specialty hospitals. </p>

<p>Anyone who thinks the Guantanamo detainees can be released without consequence doesn't have a leg to stand on. </blockquote></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ADVICE:  STOP MUSLIM IMMIGRATION</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/11/geert-wilders-the-outspoken-dutch.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.588</id>

    <published>2008-12-01T03:46:17Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T12:44:48Z</updated>

    <summary>Geert Wilders, the outspoken Dutch parliamentarian, sat down with the Wall Street Journal to discuss the invasion of Europe by Muslims and the danger presented by European multiculturists who claim all cultures are equal and denigrate their own civilization. We...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="International Affairs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islamic supremacism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="alienculture" label="ALIEN CULTURE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="geertwilders" label="GEERT WILDERS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="hughfitzgerald" label="HUGH FITZGERALD" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="islam" label="ISLAM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="multiculturalism" label="MULTICULTURALISM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="netherlands" label="NETHERLANDS" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ourcultureisbetter" label="OUR CULTURE IS BETTER" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="stopmuslimimmigration" label="STOP MUSLIM IMMIGRATION" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Geert Wilders, the outspoken Dutch parliamentarian, sat down with the Wall Street Journal to discuss the invasion of Europe by Muslims and the danger presented by European multiculturists who claim all cultures are equal and denigrate their own civilization.   We posted <a href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/10/-we-have-earlier-talked.shtml">Wilders' plea to the Dutch parliament to act and his must-see short film Fitna </a>earlier.</p>

<blockquote>As he sees it, the West suffers from an excess of toleration for those who do not share its tradition of tolerance. "We believe that -- 'we' means the political elite -- that all cultures are equal," he says. "I believe this is the biggest disease today facing Europe. . . . We should wake up and tell ourselves: You're not a xenophobe, you're not a racist, you're not a crazy guy if you say, 'My culture is better than yours.' A culture based on Christianity, Judaism, humanism is better. Look at how we treat women, look at how we treat apostates, look at how we go with the separation of church and state. I can give you 500 examples why our culture is better."</blockquote>

<p>Already Muslims in the Netherlands are 6% of the population and a tipping point is close,he believes.</p>

<blockquote>He acknowledges that "the majority of Muslims in Europe and America are not terrorists or violent people." But he says "it really doesn't matter that much, because if you don't define your own culture as the best, dominant one, and you allow through immigration people from those countries to come in, at the end of the day you will lose your own identity and your own culture, and your society will change. And our freedom will change -- all the freedoms we have will change</blockquote>

<p>We have just seen what ten determined Islamic terrorists can do to a city of 15 million in India.</p>

<p>Wilders says all the circumlocution about the Global War on Terror is missing the point.</p>

<blockquote>Since 9/11, American political leaders have struggled with the question of how to describe the ideology of the enemy without making enemies of the world's billion or so Muslims. The various terms they have tried -- "Islamic extremism," "Islamism," "Islamofascism" -- have fallen short of both clarity and melioration. Melioration is not Mr. Wilders's highest priority, and to <strong>him the truth couldn't be clearer: The problem is Islam itself. "I see Islam more as an ideology than as a religion," he explains.</strong>(emphasis added)</blockquote>

<p>What would he do?</p>

<blockquote>He says he would end Muslim immigration to the Netherlands but work to assimilate those already there.</blockquote>

<p>A key requirement of Wilders' would be to give up the Koran, from which the problem that is Islam springs.  Islam, he believes, is an ideology, much as HItler's National Socialism was..Since the Koran is the ideology's handbook inciting hatred and violence it should be outlawed.  </p>

<p><a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/023648.php#c601999">A proposal to halt Muslim immigration into the United States</a> and to work to assimilate those already here has been made as well by an American scholar of Islam Hugh Fitzgerald.</p>

<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122792271890965883.html?mod=djemITPA#printMode">Read all of the Wilders interview.</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>CALL IT WHAT IT IS:  ISLAMIC GLOBAL JIHAD</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.chathamrepublicans.com/archive/2008/11/-from-nros-the-corner.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.chathamrepublicans.com,2008://1.586</id>

    <published>2008-11-29T12:22:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-12-01T02:44:41Z</updated>

    <summary> From NRO&apos;s The Corner yesterday, November 28th: Both of the above [Mark Steyn] Andy [McCarty] wrote yesterday about our confused thinking re events in Bombay: The obsession over whether al Qaeda or its endless jumble of affiliates pulled off...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Republican</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="International Affairs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islam" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Islamic supremacism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="MARK STEYN" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Terrorism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    