Recently in Immigration Category


The launch of the Trump Administration's new green card immigration policy has generated a fierce debate about who the U.S. should take in as immigrants. Isn't U.S. policy indeed to take in the poor masses of the world, the "huddled masses" as described in the Emma Lazarus poem that was put in a panel in the base of the Statue of Liberty in 1903, almost two decades after the Statue was dedicated?

The gift of France, the statue commemorated the 100th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, which lit the beacon of liberty and freedom around the world. It had nothing to with immigration.

Since many immigrants had come through nearby Ellis Island in New York's harbor, the National Park Service thought it would be a nice tribute to add the Lazarus poem in a plaque in the base of the statue. Thus, for some, was born the idea that the U.S. would welcome whoever wanted to come, however destitute, however unfit.

All nations prefer to select their immigrants and those who will contribute to the growth and success of a nation are of course to be preferred.

In a debate in Canada last year the mass migration of Muslims pouring into Europe was the topic. Mark Steyn's closing remarks were spot on to win the debate and to make clear why the Emma Lazarus poem is no guide for an immigration policy at any time and certainly not now.



Trump Senior Advisor Stephen Miller presented the Administration's proposed green card immigration program emphasizing an immigrant's assets and readiness to assimilate. CNN's Jim Acosta wanted to know what happened to the American policy of seeking out those huddled masses yearning to breathe free.

Miller pointed out that the Statute of Liberty celebrates the U.S. as a beacon of liberty and the poem on a plaque added in the base of the statue in 1903 17 years after the statue was dedicated, was a tribute to all those who had come through Ellis Island.

Stephen Miller is one the bright young stars of the Trump Administration. He had been the Chief of Staff for Senator (now Attorney General) Jeff Sessions before joining the Trump Administration.

He is the principal author of Trump's two great speeches the far, the Riyadh and Warsaw speeches. Both were brilliantly tailored to their audiences. They are both worth reading or re-reading.

In Riyadh, without mentioning Islam by name, Trump called for the elimination of this "evil creed" motivating ISIS before representatives of 50 or so Muslim-majority nation., In Poland, which had suffered under Soviet oppression and whose military had helped win the decisive battle against Islam at the Gates of Vienna in 1683, Trump's call to gather the will to defeat Islam once again was delivered at the right place at the right time.

Full text of Donald Trump's speech in Saudi Arabia _ The Times of Israel.pdf

Trump in Poland July 6 2017 Transcript.pdf



Immigration is what is doing Europe, including Great Britain, in. That is, destroying their culture, their civilization. Douglas Murray, a long-time collaborator in promoting free speech and sovereignty, sits with Mark Steyn to talk about his new book, "The Strange Death of Europe." This hour-long talk is worth listening to for its lesson for the United States.

In Europe immigration just happened. It is still just happening and all the countries of Western Europe are changed forever, absent a civil war that the natives probably don't have the stomach or other body parts to fight.

The elites opened the gates to Muslims from the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia (Pakistan and Bangledesh) and kept them open despite pols continually showing the natives didn't want immigration at all.

The result: Crime, rape, riots, terrorized neighborhoods, robberies and the breakdown of law and order.

Muslims are the big problem in immigration. Islamic culture is rather uniform across a variety of nations because Sharia dictates how people behave, what they can do, what they can't do, who they hate, what they can learn and what they can't learn. A Scottish professor Denis Mac Eoin points out that the education system in Muslim-majority nations is as far removed as can be from anything in the West. Expecting the mindsets to meld is to expect the impossible for the vast number of Muslims. As an example, the second largest university in Pakistan does not have a bookstore on its campus.

The Trump Administration is working on a program to reject immigrants who will be in all likelihood incompatible with the civilization and laws of the U.S., such as those who advocate, practice and follow the teachings of Sharia.

Mark Steyn has a simple rule of thumb: No Muslims, as in Hungary, no rape and crime explosions. As France and the UK demonstrate, the more Muslims, the more problems. Sanity says as a first step stop Muslim immigration while figuring out how to cope with those already in the country.



What with Germany welcoming upwards of 2 million Muslim men into its country, the Muslim takeover may come sooner.

What kind of a place will Europe be then? What will happen to European civilization?

Below is an essay worth reading prepared by an Israeli-American group. It goes into a great deal of detail about what Islam really is. In addition to the short essay below, there is a PDF which lays out the facts about life under Islam. Do read that, too.

We cannot allow this to happen in the United States.

Islam is not a civilization

By Prof. Paul Eidelberg, President, Israel-America Renaissance Institute,
We need a politically incorrect and radically new multi-disciplinary and multinational understanding of Islam.

To speak of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as the “three Abrahamic faiths” or as the “three religions of the Book,” or, more significantly, as the “three monotheisms,” obscures rather than illuminates. These familiar tropes, says theologian George Weigel, ought to be retired.

The eminent French scholar Alain Besançon agrees. He writes,

“The Abraham of Genesis is not the Ibrahim of the Qur’an; Moses is not Moussa. As for Jesus, he appears, as Issa, out of place and out of time, without reference to the landscape of Israel. His mother, Mary, or Mariam, identified as the sister of Aaron, gives birth to him under a palm tree. Then Issa performs several miracles, which seem to have been drawn from the apocryphal gospels, and announces the future coming of Muhammad.”

Alain Besançon takes us deeper into the heart of the matter. He draws this theological distinction between Judaism and Christianity, on the one hand, and Islam, on the other:

Although Muslims like to enumerate the 99 names of God, missing from the list, but central to the Jewish and even more so to the Christian concept of God, is “Father” — i.e., a personal God capable of a reciprocal and loving relationship with men. The one God of the Qur’an, the God who demands submission, is a distant God; to call him “Father” would be an anthropomorphic sacrilege. The Muslim God is utterly impassive; to ascribe loving feeling to Him would be suspect. If God is not “Father,” then it is difficult to imagine the human person as having been made “in the image of God."

Now, let us admit that Islam has, over the centuries, given meaning and purpose to hundreds of millions of lives that have been decently lived. It is also true, however, that today, throughout the world, Islam finds itself in the midst of what Besançon aptly describes as “a long-delayed, wrenching, and still far from an accomplished encounter with modernity.”

Indeed, Islam continues to divide mankind into two groups, the faithful on the one hand, and creatures Islam calls “pigs” and “dogs” on the other, an attitude that fosters Islamic terrorism.

To clarify matters further, in 1985, note well that Iran’s delegate to the United Nations, Said Raja’i-Khorassani, declared that “the very concept of human rights was ‘a Judeo-Christian invention’ and inadmissible in Islam.”

The indiscriminate nature of Islamic terrorism can be explained by these words of Catholic theologian George Weigel: “The notion that there are ‘no innocents,’ that the enemy is ‘guilty’ simply by reason of drawing breath – logically entails a strategy of open-ended mayhem based on the radical dehumanization of the ‘other.’”

Dehumanization describes the terrorist acts of the Palestinian Authority. This consortium of Muslim-led terrorist groups reduces Jewish children to body parts by exploding the busses in which they ride to school. There is no essential difference between these Muslim terrorists and those that perpetrated the bloodbath in Paris, in Nice, and in Orlando.

Alain Besancon, quoted by Dr. Weigel, exposes another obscure aspect of Islam: “Although Muslims like to enumerate the 99 names of God, missing among the list is ‘father’ – i.e., a personal God capable of a reciprocal and loving relationship with men. If God is not our ‘father,’ then it is difficult to imagine the human person as having been made ‘in the image of God.’” Small wonder that Muslims liken “infidels” to “pigs” and “dogs,” and harbor no qualms about using their own children as human bombs to explode Jewish schools busses, thus reducing Jewish children to body parts.

The social philosopher Lou Harris offers a broader assessment of Islam in Civilization and Its Enemies. Contemptuous of the cultural relativism propagated by American colleges and universities, Harris means by civilization a standard of behavior that can be applied across cultures and across history. He sees civilization as having four prerequisites: a stable social order, the co-operation of individuals pursuing their own interests, the ability to tolerate or socialize with one’s neighbors, and a hatred of violence.

Clearly, Islam lacks three of the four prerequisites of Harris’ definition of a civilization. What is remarkable is that Syrian-born psychiatrist Wafa Sultan arrived at the same conclusion. She denied a clash between the West and Islamic civilization because, in her view, Islam is not a civilization!

Egyptian-born scholar Bat Ye’or agrees. She defines Islam as a culture of hate, and one can cite several former Muslims who renounced Islam for this very reason.

That said, I have collected several essays by renowned scholars and statesmen who, even though they represent different nations and even different periods of history, nonetheless agree about the egregious nature of Islam, which justifies the title of Harris’ book Civilization and Its Enemies.
Click on the link below to read the collection:

Islam is not a civilization.pdf



Islam is currently staging a massive invasion of Europe. The invaders fan out across Europe seeking to settle in the nations with the best welfare benefits. Britain is a prime target, but the UK is waking up and is restricting the number of invaders allowed into the country (It should be zero.).

Islam is at war with the rest of us. Every Muslim is raised to be a soldier in Mohammad's army to wage war against us, to intimidate us, to terrify us, to overwhelm us and ultimately to control our lives - force us to become Muslim, die or live as a humiliated being paying onerous taxes to stay alive.

It's been that way for 1400 years and many, many millions have been killed by Islam's armies, some estimate as many as 280 million. These days they don't march as soldiers in battalions , but in mobs or as sole actors, but the goal is the same -- that Muslims control everything, because, taught from birth, as superior people they are entitled to it.

What happens when the quiet town of Calais, the traditional crossing point from France to Britain, is inundated with Muslims bent on getting to Britain to enjoy their generous benefits?

This video by a native of Calais tells the horrible story of violence and terror they are suffering from, with no protection whatsoever from police, local or national officials.

It may be too late for Europe, but this bitter lesson should teach us that we can not allow such an invasion. Since every Muslim receives the same indoctrination, it is near impossible to weed out those who are not a threat. In Calais, if they exist,they are a small minority. Thanks to Diana West for the video.



With billions of people in the world unhappy with their economic lot, it is impossible to think that the U.S. can help them all by allowing them to immigrate to the U.S.

The best economically successful nations can do is help them in the home countries to improve their own economies.

The biggest obstacle to doing so in majority Muslim countries is Islam itself. Practicing Sharia, the Islamic way of life, almost guarantees that no successful economy can be built.

That is because the purpose of Islam is to wage war, not provide decent lives for its people. Islam raises soldiers, not productive citizens. The ethic of Islam is to subdue others and take all or part of what they earn to support the soldiers and their families. When soldiers aren't fighting, they're resting. Rich Muslim countries, those with oil, staff their oil operations mostly with non-Muslims, since it's beneath the dignity of Muslims to engage in hard work. Yes, that's changing somewhat, as western influences seep in.

Anyway, here is a graphic presentation of the impossibility of the U.S. solving the economic woes of the world through immigration into America.



Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama is the most informed and knowledgeable member of Congress on immigration and the composition of the American population. He has conducted an in-depth analysis of recent trends and finds them of great concern:

“I love America. I believe I’m an elected official. And who puts me in office? […] The people who should benefit from my actions are the American people. That’s who should be first. Some people seem to think they represent groups, they seem to think we represent the whole world, they think we represent business groups, and activist groups and La Raza or the Chamber of Commerce, and we’re losing sight of who we represent. And it’s absolutely clear that too large a flow of [foreign] workers, particularly lower skilled workers, hammer American workers, damage their ability to get a pay raise or even get a job. That’s not disputable. That matter has been settled. And someone needs to be worried about those people… I think that’s been lost sight of in your nation’s capital.”

When Senator Sessions speaks, we sure better listen.

Read the entire report.



The UN Refugee Desk, controlled by a Muslim organization, with the aid of Obama and his State Department, is flooding the United States with Muslims brought up to hate, denigrate and subdue or kill us. From violent Islamic countries like Somalia, Syria, Iraq and Libya. How many true believers will we get who will wind up leaving to join ISIS or instituting terror attacks here?

We can see what the Muslim invasion is doing to Europe, which is defenseless as migrants storm into it by land and sea. A casual visitor to any large western European city will be appalled to see what is happening. Read Europe news; it's worse.

Though we're separated by thousands of miles from Muslim territories Obama is holding the door open for the same kind of Muslim invasion of the U.S. Watch this four minute video to learn yet another way that Obama is changing America for the worse.

Displaced Muslims should be relocated to stable Muslim countries like Saudi Arabia and Indonesia, not sent to the U.S. and Europe.



John Hinderaker of PowerLine blog makes the case for protecting American jobs in any immigration overhaul:

Today the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest held a hearing on the displacement of American workers through the H-1B and related guest worker programs. Among the witnesses was Prof. Hal Salzman of Rutgers. This exchange pretty much says it all, with regard to the fictitious “STEM shortage.”

Q. Prof. Salzman, in an article that appeared in U.S. News and World Report, you wrote, “guest workers currently make up two-thirds of all IT hires.” That’s two-thirds of all information technology hiring in America was done by guest workers. What would happen if the guest worker green card provisions in the Gang of Eight bill, or the SKILLS Act, or I-Squared became law? How would it change things?

Prof. Salzman: Well, it would dramatically increase the number. And we find, based on those estimates, that it would provide enough guest workers to fill 100 percent of the jobs with perhaps 50 percent left in reserve that could then be used to backfill and replace current workers. So the current bills supply more than even what the industry says it needs to fill every new job.

So who would lose those jobs? Right: American citizens. In his prepared testimony, Salzman added:

* The U.S. supply of top performing graduates is large and far exceeds the hiring needs of the STEM industries.

* Future demand for computer science graduates can be met by just half to two-thirds of the current annual supply of U.S. computer science graduates.

* Guestworker supply is large and highly concentrated in the IT industry; it is likely a factor in both stagnant wages and job insecurity.

* The predominant function of IT guestworker visa programs is to facilitate the offshoring of IT work.

* A growing function of the IT guestworker visa programs is to replace American workers for domestic-based projects.

* The number of guestworkers is equal to two-thirds of current entry-level and early-career hiring.

* Current guestworker visa policies for students and new graduates appear to provide incentives to colleges and universities to establish Masters programs that, as their business model, almost exclusively recruit foreign students into lower quality programs that provide easy entry into the U.S. labor market, further expanding the supply of entry-level STEM workers. …

* “Green Cards for Grads” provisions in I-Squared, S. 744 and other bills would provide incentives for colleges and universities to establish or expand current Masters programs as “global services” that offer a green card for the price of a graduate degree, and that are offered primarily or even exclusively for foreign students and directly or indirectly exclude U.S. students.

* In sum, current policies and the proposed changes in high skill guestworker visas and immigration policies that increase the supply of guestworkers are likely to accelerate the already deteriorating labor force conditions and career prospects for STEM graduates and workers.

None of this seems very hard to grasp. All across America, workers have seen their wages decline as jobs grow ever scarcer. This is Obamanomics: Democrat Party cronies get rich, while the middle class withers away.

Jeff Sessions, as always the main spokesman for the aspirations of American workers, said this at today’s hearing:

People aren’t commodities. We compare labor to commodities, but they’re not commodities. They’re human beings. They have families. They have hopes and dreams. They want stability in their lives. They would like to have a good job at a company like the biggest utility in California—California Edison [where hundreds of Americans were laid off and replaced with guest workers]… We have no obligation to yield to the lust of big businesses… Mr. Zuckerberg is worth $27 billion, I guess he is 27 years old, I’m not sure. So he wants more foreign workers. I would like to think he might want to pay his employees more and maybe not have quite so many billions, if he’d like to be helpful, and maybe he could get more local workers.

And here he is on video, with his customary plain-speaking style:

It is undeniable that Congress’s duty is to American workers, not foreign workers, however admirable those individuals may be. The message that Sessions articulated today, as he has repeatedly over the past several years, is devastating. The Democrats cannot stand up against it. If Republicans consistently articulate a populist, pro-American worker message on immigration, they will sweep the 2016 election from the presidency on down to your local county commissioner. And they will be doing the right thing for the people they represent.



What would a sensible immigration policy like? We should look for guidance to Canada, which updated its approach under the leadership of the conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Here's who they are targeting:

Entrepreneurial, well educated, with skills that fit the job market and a good command of English or French, immigrants today are better equipped than ever to integrate successfully into our economy and society. Such immigrants are likely to believe that people can and should pull themselves up by their own bootstraps, just as they did.

You could call them “bootstrap immigrants.”

Read all about it....



What did the mid-term elections tell us about American attitudes towards immigration?

Victor Davis Hanson observes:

It would seem that Americans appreciate the vibrancy, energy, and new ideas that immigrants bring. But a great many Americans also insist that immigrants come legally, in manageable numbers, in ethnically diverse fashion, and that they be eager to learn English and assimilate quickly.

Read it all.



Everything that Senator Sessions writes about the dagger Obama is readying to plunge into the hearts of working Americans with his immigration amnesty executive action must be read and heeded. Obama must be stopped. He can be stopped.

Obama and the Democrats have sold out to the billionaires who fund their campaigns.

The first step must be taken tomorrow: Working Americans and their families must vote Republican in every senatorial and congressional election.

Senator Sessions: Obama wants immigration amnesty; your vote can stop it.

By Sen. Jeff Sessions November 2, 2014

A nation’s first loyalty must be to its own citizens.

But the immigration policies of President Obama and Congressional Democrats help only billionaire special interests, amnesty activists, and the citizens of other countries – while reducing jobs and pay for our own.

Every single Senate Democrat voted for the Obama-backed plan to provide immediate work permits to 12 million illegal immigrants – allowing them to compete for any job in America. This legislation would also double the rate at which low-wage guest workers are brought into the U.S. to fill jobs throughout the economy.

Further, the legislation would triple the rate of permanent immigration, giving lifetime work permits and citizenship to over 30 million immigrants over the next ten years.

Immigration lobbyists have so little regard for you, that they are meeting in secret with the White House right now to plan executive amnesty orders. These orders, planned for after the election, would implement by executive fiat the sweeping amnesty that was rejected by the Republican House.
America already has the world’s most generous immigration policy. The foreign-born population is at record levels, quadrupling since 1970. Since 2000, the U.S. has issued nearly 30 million lawful visas to foreign guest workers and permanent immigrants. During that time, all net employment gains among the working-age went to immigrant workers.

This large surplus of labor has also pulled down wages –family incomes are down more than $3,000 since 2009 alone.

Harvard Professor Dr. George Borjas estimates that our current high immigration rates result in a wage loss of $402 billion every year for competing American workers.

Imagine then what will happen if we double the supply of foreign labor. For many Americans, who will be pushed out of the workforce altogether, their wages will be reduced to zero.

Democrats running for Senate pour millions into ads complaining special interests have too much influence. And yet every Senate Democrat candidate has voted for the crown jewel of the corporate lobbyist agenda: mass amnesty and uncontrolled immigration.

Their plan is championed by open borders billionaires like Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg – global CEOs who don’t think you’re entitled to the same protections their gates and fences provide them.

In fact, these immigration lobbyists have so little regard for you, that they are meeting in secret with the White House right now to plan executive amnesty orders. These orders, planned for after the election, would implement, by executive fiat, the sweeping amnesty that was rejected by the Republican House.

The planned order would include work permits for millions of illegal immigrants while substantially boosting the supply of new foreign labor– taking precious jobs directly from struggling Americans.

Efforts by Republican Senators to block this illegal amnesty were repeatedly thwarted by Leader Harry Reid’s Senate Democrat majority.

Immigration enforcement has already been decimated. Interior removals have plummeted more than 40% since 2009. Forty thousand illegal immigrant family members who had just recently crossed the border were released by the feds and failed, predictably, to appear in court. People just show up at the border and are simply released into the country – free to claim local benefits funded by U.S. taxpayers.

Seventy percent of asylum applications show warning signs of fraud. ICE officers report that they are barred from enforcing immigration law against the millions who illegally overstay their visas – a number surging every single day.

Internal DHS documents show that there are 167,000 convicted criminal aliens who were ordered deported but are at large in the U.S. and released from custody.

The administration’s non-enforcement directives have placed almost the entire illegal immigrant and overstay population beyond the reach of law enforcement. The president’s own former ICE director explained: “If you are a run-of-the-mill immigrant here illegally, your odds of getting deported are close to zero.”

If the president’s promised executive amnesty goes through, we will functionally have open borders in America.

But the citizens of this country, through their vote, have the power to stop it.

The elite denizens of Washington and Wall Street scorn and mock the good and decent people of this country for wanting their laws enforced and their communities protected. They try to make you feel bad for having sensible and rational concerns about how uncontrolled immigration impacts your jobs, schools, neighborhoods, and community resources.

After years of mass immigration, falling wages, and surging joblessness, isn’t it time we focused on the needs of the people living here today? Isn’t it time we got our own people back to work?

But these cosmopolitan elites, these great citizens of the world, turn a blind eye to the suffering and poverty in their own backyards. These “Masters of the Universe” have forgotten that a nation owes its first loyalty to its own citizens.

And they want you to believe that you can't win.

But they are so wrong.

And with your vote, you have the power to prove them wrong. You have the power to deliver a message they won’t forget.

Republican Jeff Sessions represents Alabama in the United States Senate. He is ranking member of the Budget Committee.



Although the American public overwhelmingly are opposed to the President taken unilateral action on immigration, that is just what Obama plans to do after the mid-term elections.

The U.S. senator who has been fighting hardest and longest against Obama's plans that would do great damage to working Americans is Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama. He accuses the president and Senate Democrats working for global CEOs and special interests rather than their own people.

"The world has turned upside down. Instead of serving the interests of the American people, the policies of President Obama and every Senate Democrat serve the needs of special interests and global CEOs who fail to understand the duty a nation owes to its own people.

Read the whole thing.

"The Wall Street Journal confirmed today that the President is planning to issue a massive unilateral executive amnesty after the election.

"In its report, the WSJ certifies that this executive amnesty would provide work permits for illegal immigrants—taking jobs directly from struggling Americans.

"Based on the USCIS contract bid and statements from USCIS employees, we know this executive immigration order is likely to be broader in scope than anyone has imagined.
"Earlier this week, President Obama’s former head of Homeland Security revealed that she overrode resistance from administration lawyers and law enforcement agents in implementing the President’s earlier unlawful amnesty and work authorization program for illegal immigrants 30 and under. This was an open admission by one of the most senior people in government of violating one’s oath of office in order to accomplish a nakedly political aim.

"The President is assuming for himself the sole and absolute power to decide who can enter, work, live, and claim benefits in the United States. He has exempted virtually every group in the world from America’s immigration laws: people who enter before a certain age, people related to people who enter before a certain age, adults traveling with minors, minors traveling with adults, illegal immigrants who are not convicted of serious crimes, illegal workers who are convicted of serious crimes but not enough serious crimes, almost anyone who shows up the border and demands asylum, the millions who overstay their visas, and, as was recently exposed, illegal immigrants with serious criminal histories. The list continues to grow.

"A nation creates borders and laws to protect its own citizens. What about their needs?

"The President is systemically stripping away the immigration protections to which every single American worker and their family is entitled. He doesn’t care how this impacts Americans’ jobs, wages, schools, tax bills, hospitals, police departments, or communities.

"But it gets worse still. The WSJ reports that the President is ‘expected to benefit businesses that use large numbers of legal immigrants, such as technology companies.’ Those changes include measures to massively expand the number of foreign workers for IT companies—measures aggressively lobbied for by IT giants like Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates. Yet we have more than 11 million Americans with STEM degrees who don’t have jobs in these fields. Rutgers professor Hal Salzman documented that two-thirds of all new IT jobs are being filled by foreign workers. From 2000 through today, a period of record legal immigration, all net gains in employment among the working-age have gone entirely to immigrant workers.

"And now, in order to help open borders billionaires, President Obama is going to deny millions of Americans their shot at entering the middle class and a better life.

"The world has turned upside down. Instead of serving the interests of the American people, the policies of President Obama and every Senate Democrat serve the needs of special interests and global CEOs who fail to understand the duty a nation owes to its own people. But the citizens of this country still hold the power, and through their voice, they can turn the country right-side again."



Republican Senator Jeff Sessions is leading the fight for the men and women of America who are working and those who want to be working. Session is opposed to the plans of the Democratic Senate majority and Obama to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants that would tear apart the job market for Americans.

Supporting this unilateral grant of amnesty by Obama in a key vote in July were Democratic senators Shaheen of New Hampshire, Markey of Massachusetts, Hagan of North Carolina, Begich of Alaska, Pryor of Arkansas and Landrieu of Louisiana. These senators are all up for election on November 4th and should go down to defeat because they put their Democrat political donors ahead of the interests of the people they were elected to represent.

Senator Sessions, a senior member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and Ranking Member of the Budget Committee, has been a relentless champion of protecting American jobs, battling the Obama Administration, congressional Democrats and the billionaire corporate immigration lobby that would crush the middle class.

On September 12th on the Senate floor Senator Sessions laid out in detail the facts about the enormous damage that the Democrats' immigration amnesty plan would do to America.

Session vowed that the voices of the American people would prevail over the billionaire "Masters of the Universe" who would rob Americans of their livelihood and their future.

“Earlier this week I spoke about the President's promise that he would issue an executive amnesty to 5 or 6 million people. The planned amnesty would include work permits, photo ID's, and Social Security numbers for millions of people who illegally entered the U.S., illegally overstayed their visas, or defrauded U.S. immigration authorities.

The Senate Democratic Conference has supported and enabled the President's unlawful actions and blocked every effort to stop them. Not even one of our Democratic colleagues has backed the House legislation that would stop this planned executive amnesty or demanded that Senator Reid bring it up for a vote. Every Senate Democrat is therefore the President's partner in his planned lawless acts.

Tonight I would like to talk about the influence of special interests on our nation's immigration system. How did we get to the point where elected officials, activist groups, the ACLU, and global CEOs are openly working to deny American workers the immigration protections to which they are legally entitled? How did we get to the point where the Democratic Party is prepared to nullify and wipe away the immigration laws of the United States of America?

Just yesterday Majority Leader Reid wrote in a tweet something that was shocking. He said: ‘Since House Republicans have failed to act on immigration, I know the President will. When he does, I hope he goes real big.’

Let this sink in for a moment. The Majority Leader of the Senate is bragging that he knows the President will circumvent Congress to issue executive amnesty to millions, and he is encouraging the President to ensure this amnesty includes as many people as possible. And the White House has acknowledged that 5 to 6 million is the number they are looking at.

Has one Senate Democrat stepped forward to reject Mr. Reid's statement? Has one Senate Democrat stepped forward to say: I support the legislation passed by the House of Representatives that would secure the border and block this executive amnesty? Have they ever said they support that? Have they ever said: I will do everything in my power to see that the House legislation gets a vote in the Senate so the American people can know what is going on? No. All we hear is silence.





Contact: Diane Bronsdon 508 945 9218
C R Facebook
To help us do our part to keep America strong and well informed, just click below. Donate Now!


Michael O'Keffe District Attorney
Leo Cakounes Barn.Cty Commish
Sheriff Cummings
Hot Air
Legal Insurrection
National Review
Power Line
Pajamas Media


Semper Fi Fund
Cape Cod Cares for Our Troops
Wounded Warrior Family Support
New England Center and Home for Veterans
Chatham Info
Monthly Archive

Category Yearly Archives