Recently in Culture matters Category


Finally, a university, the University of Chicago, speaks up for the role of an academic institution, as a place of inquiry, of questioning, of different ideas, of discomfit sometimes, a place where critical thinking is to be developed.

Below is Professor Thomas Sowell's congratulations to the University of Chicago. Below that is a link to the original op-ed in the Wall Street Journal and the WSJ editorial about it.

A Gem in Chicago
By Dr. Thomas Sowell

August 30, 2016

We have gotten so used to seeing college presidents and other academic "leaders" caving in to so many outrageous demands from little gangs of bullying students that it is a long overdue surprise to see a sign that at least one major university has shown some backbone.

Dr. Robert J. Zimmer, president of the University of Chicago, has spoken out in the plainest language against the stifling of opinions that differ from political correctness, on campuses across the country.

"Free speech is at risk at the very institution where it should be assured: the university," Dr. Zimmer said.

"Invited speakers are disinvited because a segment of a university community deems them offensive, while other orators are shouted down for similar reasons," he said. Demands have been made that assigned readings in some courses be eliminated because they "might make some students uncomfortable."

Worst of all, such demands "have been supported by university administrators," Dr. Zimmer pointed out.

By contrast with many other colleges and universities where speech codes restrict what students can and cannot say, freshmen students entering the University of Chicago have been informed by a letter from the Dean of Students that "freedom of expression" is one of that institution's "defining characteristics."

The Dean of Students spelled it out: "Members of our community are encouraged to speak, write, listen, challenge and learn, without fear of censorship. Civility and mutual respect are vital to all of us, and freedom of expression does not mean the freedom to harass or threaten others."

That such things need to be said is a painful commentary on the academic world in general. It is doubtful if any such declaration or policy could be made at any of the Ivy League universities, which are bastions of political correctness.

At Harvard, not only have invited speakers been shouted down and sometimes assaulted, even a Harvard professor's classroom was invaded by disruptive students who didn't like what he was teaching. Such things have also happened at Berkeley and other elite institutions across the country, as well as at less renowned institutions.

The uniqueness of the University of Chicago is not something new. Back in the 1960s, as campus riots spread across the country, and academic administrators caved in to even the most outrageous demands, dozens of disruptive students were simply expelled from the University of Chicago and dozens more were put on probation. As Professor George J. Stigler, a Nobel Prize-winning economist, said, "our faculty united behind the expulsion of a large number of young barbarians."

But such faculty support required a sense of mission, beyond a quiet life on campus in which to pursue one's own career. Even as grade inflation soared, and failing grades virtually disappeared in some colleges and universities across the country, that was not true among professors of economics who had been trained at the University of Chicago.

A survey in the economics department at Cornell University, during a year in the 1960s when I taught there, showed that the only students who received a failing grade in any economics course that year were students who took courses taught by professors who were trained at the University of Chicago.

In later years, when I gave failing grades to one-fourth of my class at UCLA, I discovered that this was not at all unusual in UCLA's economics department, which had a sizable contingent of economists trained at the University of Chicago. We also opposed many politically correct policies of the UCLA administration.

One of the many name-calling responses to people who do not go along with political correctness is to use the all-purpose smear, "racism." But the first time I saw a white professor at a white university with a black secretary, it was Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago in 1960 — four years before the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Years earlier, the first black tenured professor at an elite white university was Allison Davis at the University of Chicago. But who cares about facts in these politically correct times?

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at

President Zimmer's op-ed in the WSJ

WSJ editorial praising the U of Chicago's president and Dean



Condoleezza Rice teamed up to perform "Amazing Grace" to benefit Wounded Warriors, an incredibly deserving charity. To donate to Wounded Warriors, look in our right hand column for "Links."

It's people like this who make America great.



Project Veritas is a valuable service exposing the terrible things that are being done by government agencies and other organizations that should be stopped. That only will happen with public expose and that's what Project Veritas does -- expose.

In this 10-minute video clip Project Veritas shows how the VA is failing the veterans it is supposed to care for. VA created drug addiction led to the suicide of this 28-year old veteran.

Project Veritas is doing work no one else is doing and it is doing it effectively. To make a tax-deductible contribution, go to its website



Megyn Kelly is bright, tough and courageous. While many in the media and punditry were running in fear of Muslim violence away from defending the free speech event in Garland, Texas, Megyn came out firing with both barrels for American values.



Despite warnings about how government handouts would kill ambition and stall the chances of upward mobility, for 50 years the handouts have continued and the percentage of Americans under the poverty level is greater than it was in 1966.

Jason Riley, a black who writes for the Wall Street Journal, quoting blacks such as Shelby Steele and Frederick Douglass, pleads for ending programs promoting dependency and giving blacks the chance to learn how to climb the ladder of success on their own.

Until those in the black underclass develop the work habits, behaviors and attitudes that proved necessary for other groups to rise, they will continue to struggle. And to the extent that a social program, however well-meaning, interferes with a group's self-development, it does more harm than good.
How Not to Help Black Americans

Failed poverty programs have tried to do what blacks can only do for themselves.

By Jason L. Riley
June 17, 2014
Wall Street Journal Opinion

'The concept of historic reparation grows out of man's need to impose a degree of justice on the world that simply does not exist," writes Shelby Steele in "The Content of Our Character." "Blacks cannot be repaid for the injustice done to the race, but we can be corrupted by society's guilt gestures of repayment."

Mr. Steele's words come to mind after reading a much-discussed argument for slavery reparations in the June issue of the Atlantic magazine. "The consequences of 250 years of enslavement, of war upon black families and black people, were profound," says the essay's author, Ta-Nehisi Coates. No disagreement there. But the enslavers and the enslaved are long gone, and Mr. Coates presents no evidence that what currently ails the black poor will be addressed by allowing them to cash in on the exploitation of dead ancestors.

Ironically, Mr. Coates spends most of the article detailing how previous government efforts to narrow black-white social and economic disparities—from Reconstruction to the New Deal to the Great Society—have largely failed. Yet he concludes that what's needed is more of the same—namely, another grand wealth-redistribution scheme in the guise of slavery reparations.

This year we are marking the 50th anniversary of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, and next year we will do the same for the Voting Rights Act. These landmark pieces of legislation, signed by President Lyndon Johnson, outlawed racial discrimination and ensured the ability of blacks to register and vote. But Johnson wasn't satisfied with these victories. He was convinced that government could and should do more.

"You do not take a person who, for years, has been hobbled by chains and liberate him, bring him up to the starting line of a race and then say, 'you are free to compete with all the others,' and still justly believe that you have been completely fair," Johnson said in 1965 at the start of his Great Society. The "next and the more profound stage of the battle for civil rights" was "not just freedom but opportunity" and "not just equality as a right and a theory but equality as a fact and equality as a result."

Like Johnson, liberals today remain convinced that government has the ability to produce equal outcomes, though history repeatedly shows that intergroup differences are the norm rather than the exception. The reality is that social policy, however well intentioned, has its limits, and when those limits aren't acknowledged the results can be counterproductive.




Cultural decline is being engineered by leftists in government, the media and Hollywood. They are erasing whatever remnants of our Judeo-Christian culture they can, driving civilization back to a pre-modern bottom.

Professor Victor Davis Hanson is a fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution in Palo Alto, but still lives on his family's farm in the agricultural Central Valley near Fresno. He therefore travels between the hellhole of illegal immigration and lawlessness and the elite enclaves of the super rich and successful. The elites pay no attention to the "other California" and the "other California" has no understanding of or connection with the elites who hold all the power.

Professor Hanson reports on what he sees.

The Last Generation of the West and the Thin Strand of Civilization By Victor Davis Hanson

January 19th, 2014

Had the Greeks lost at Salamis, Western civilization might easily have been strangled in its adolescence. Had Hitler not invaded the Soviet Union, the European democracies would have probably remained overwhelmed. And had the Japanese just sidestepped the Philippines and Pearl Harbor, as they gobbled up the orphaned Pacific colonies of a defunct Western Europe, the Pacific World as we know it now might be a far different, far darker place.

I am not engaging in pop counterfactual history, as much as reminding us of how thin the thread of civilization sometimes hangs, both in its beginning and full maturity. Something analogous is happening currently in the 21st-century West. But the old alarmist scenarios — a nuclear exchange, global warming and the melting of the polar ice caps, a new lethal AIDS-like virus — should not be our worry.

Rather our way of life is changing not with a bang, but with a whimper, insidiously and self-inflicted, rather than abruptly and from foreign stimuli. Most of the problem is cultural. Unfortunately it was predicted by a host of pessimistic anti-democratic philosophers from Plato and Aristotle to Hegel and Spengler. I’ve always hoped that these gloom-and-doomers were wrong about the Western paradigm, but some days it becomes harder.

Over 90 million Americans who could work are not working (the “non-institutionalized” over 16). What we take for granted — our electrical power, fuel, building materials, food, health care, and communications — all hinge on just 144 million getting up in the morning to produce what about 160-170 million others (the sick, the young, and the retired who need assistance along with the 90 million idle) consume.

Every three working Americans provide sustenance for two who are not ill, enfeebled, or too young. The former help the disabled, the latter take resources from them. The gang-banger has only disdain for the geek at the mall — until one Saturday night his liver is shredded by gang gunfire and suddenly he whimpers (who is now the real wimp?) that he needs such a Stanford-trained nerd to do sophisticated surgery to get him back in one piece to the carjackings, muggings, assaults, and knockout games — or lawsuits follow!

Given that the number of non-working is growing (an additional 10 million were idled in the Obama “recovery” alone), it is likely to keep growing. At some point, we will hit a 50/50 ratio of idle versus active. Then things will get interesting. The percentage of workers’ pay deducted to pay for the non-working will soar even higher. So will the present redistributive schemes and the borrowing from the unborn.

We forget that the obligations of the working to care for the 70-80 million who genuinely cannot work become more difficult, when the 90 million who can work for all sorts of reasons won’t. Note the theme of this essay: the more in humane fashion we provide unemployment insurance, food stamps, subsidized housing, legal advice, health care and disability insurance, the more the recipients find it all inadequate, inherent proof of unfairness and inequality, and always not enough.

Much of the Modern University Output Coarsens American Life

We will hear even more shrillness about “fairness” and “equality.” The more government support, all the more will grow the sense of being shorted. When someone idle receives a free iPhone, he doesn’t thank government for its magnanimity. More likely, he damns it for allowing someone else the ability to purchase an updated, superior model. I have talked to several students about their iPhones; so far not one has said, “Wow, I have more computer and communications power in my palm than a multi-millionaire had just 15 years ago.” Mostly they wished they had an updated version like someone better off.

An indebted and crippled U.S. has so far survived the second decade of the 21st century largely due to some ingenious engineers and audacious workers who revolutionized the gas and oil industry, at a time when wind and solar merely amused us, when our enemies considered us ripe for perpetual petro-blackmail, and when our wherewithal to pay for more imported energy was increasingly questionable.

A very few people are saving very many. But how thin the strand of civilization hangs — given that the forces of our modern Lotus Eaters (every bit as dangerous in their postmodern imaginations as the Cyclopes are in their premodern savagery) have stopped the Keystone Pipeline, stopped most federal leasing of new gas and oil finds, and are trying to regulate fracking and horizontal drilling out of existence where it might be most vital to the U.S. — as in the Monterey Shale formation in California.

How ironic is the Sierra Club Bay Area grandee who finds light when he flips on his office switch, and would find no light were his utopian ideas about wind, solar, and biomass to come to full fruition. Only what he despises — radioactive uranium, messy drilling rigs, and unnatural dams — for now continue to bring him what he must have. Again, the theme: the more the green activists empty reservoirs to save a bait fish, or stop fracking, or prevent salvage logging, the angrier they sigh that it is not enough and the more they must count on someone ignoring them to provide them with what they must have.

The universities were the great backbone of the West, from the Academy and Lyceum to medieval Pisa and Oxbridge to the great 18th- and 19th-century founding of American campuses. Not necessarily any longer. Too many are bankrupt morally, economically, politically, and culturally.

The symptoms are terrifying: one trillion dollars in student debt (many of these loans accruing at higher than average interest rates and even before students have graduated); a small Eloi class of rarefied elites who teach little and write in runes that no one can decipher; a large Morlock class of part-timers and oppressed lecturers who subsidize the fat and waste of the tenured and administrative classes; graduates who are arrogant but ignorant, nursed on –studies ideology without the liberal arts foundations to back up their zeal; and a BA/BS brand that no longer ensures better-paying jobs, if any jobs at all.

In sum, apart from the sciences and medicine, most of the university coarsens rather than enlightens American life.

The current campus is unsustainable and we are beginning to see its decline, as online courses and for-profit tech schools usurp its students. The liberal arts are not nurtured and protected for another generation in the university. Instead, their umbilical cords have become cut with the cleaver of race/class/gender no-nothingism. Again the theme: the more bloated, exploitive, and costly the university, the more it lashes out it that it is short-changed, the victim of philistine budget cuts, and the last bastion of civilized life.

Civilization Seems to Be Losing

Popular culture is likewise anti-civilizational. Does anyone believe that Kanye West, Miley Cyrus, and Lady Gaga are updates to Glenn Miller, jazz, Bob Dylan and the Beatles? Even in the bimbo mode, Marilyn Monroe had an aura that Ms. Kardashian and Ms. Hilton lack. Teens wearing bobby socks and jeans have transmogrified to strange creatures in our midst with head-to -oe tattoos and piercings as if we copied Papua New Guinea rather than it us. Why the superficial skin-deep desire to revert to the premodern? When I walk in some American malls and soak in the fashion, I am reminded of National Geographic tribal photos of the 1950s.

Again the theme: the more we borrow to provide iPads to our supposedly deprived youth, the more in theory they can access in a nano-second the treasures of their culture and heritage, and in fact the more likely it is that they have no clue what Gettysburg was, who Thomas Jefferson was, or who fought whom over what in World War II. Our managers in education, terrified of confronting the causes of ignorance, believed that the faster youths could transmit nothingness, the more likely they might stumble onto somethingness.

The fourth-century Greeks at the end pasted silver over their worthless bronze coins — “reds” being the protruding noses and hair of the portraiture that first appeared bronze-like, as the silver patina rubbed off. The bastardization of the currency fostered many books on Roman decline. More worthless money for more people was a sign of “crisis” — analogous to our own quantitative easing and $17 trillion in debt.

Once more the theme here is not just that we are insolvent, but that we are so insolvent that it is now a thought-crime to talk of dissolution, bankruptness, and irresponsible spending — all damned as symptoms of “callousness” to the poor, proof of “social injustice”, and “obsessions” with deficits. The medicine of austerity always becomes worse than the disease of profligacy.

What do I mean about the “thinning strand of civilization”?

A shrinking percentage of our population feeds us, finds our energy, protects us, and builds things we count on. They get up each morning to do these things, in part in quest for the good life, in part out of a sense of social obligation and basic humanity, in part because they know they will die if idle and thrive only when busy, and in part simply because “they like it.”

We can stack the deck against them with ever higher taxes, ever more regulations, ever more obligations to others, and they may well continue. But not if we also damn them as the “1%” and call them the agents of inequality and the fat cats who did not build what they built or who profited when they should not have.

You cannot expect the military to protect us, and then continually order it to reflect every aspect of postmodern American sensitivity in a risky premodern world. Filing a lawsuit to divert a river’s water to the sea during a drought is a lot easier and cleaner than welding together well-casings at sea. Last week, an off-duty armed correctional officer in Fresno intervened in a wild carjacking, shooting and killing the gang-member killer and thus limiting his carnage to one death and two woundings rather than five or six killings — at the very moment Harvey Weinstein — of guns-blazing Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction fame and profits — promised to destroy the NRA. These contrasts say everything about the premodern, the postmodern and the innocent who pay the tab in-between.

Each day when I drive to work I try to look at the surrounding communities, and count how many are working and how many of the able-bodied are not. I listen to the car radio and tally up how many stories, both in their subject matter and method of presentation, seem to preserve civilization, or how many seem to tear it down. I try to assess how many drivers stay between the lines, how many weave while texting or zoom in and out of traffic at 90mph or honk and flip off drivers.

Today, as the reader can note from the tone of this apocalyptic essay, civilization seemed to be losing.





What are the roots of the problem when random acts of mass murder occur? The incidence of mass murders has declined, but random acts of mass murders, where no intent is readily discernible, have increased. Michael Ramirez has some thoughts.

Ramirez RootEvil.jpg

Mark Steyn makes the point that "the media’s stampede for meaning in massacre this last week overlooks the obvious: that the central meaning of these acts is that they are without meaning....the infanticidal maniac of Sandy Hook was merely conscripting grade-school extras for a hollow act of public suicide."



Where is America headed? Populations are plummeting worldwide as women are bearing fewer and fewer children. The future of government retirement programs are in jeopardy because there won't be enough workers to support those who have retired.

Until recently, it was thought that the U.S. was immune from this problem. However, recent data shows that birth rates in all ethnic groups in the U.S. have dropped sharply to well below "replacement rate," the rate needed to keep the population stable.

There are various reasons for this: Higher education for many causing a delay in marriage and child-bearing and personal decisions against marriage and children being among the most prominent. Professor Robert George of Princeton believes that

"limited government “cannot be maintained where the marriage culture collapses and families fail to form or easily dissolve. Where these things happen, the health, education, and welfare functions of the family will have to be undertaken by someone, or some institution, and that will sooner or later be the government.” Marriage is what makes the entire Western project​—​liberalism, the dignity of the human person, the free market, and the limited, democratic state​—​possible.

“The two greatest institutions ever devised for lifting people out of poverty and enabling them to live in dignity are the market economy and the institution of marriage. These institutions will, in the end, stand or fall together.”

Will people care enough about the future of mankind to change their habits when the culture in which they live are pushing them in the opposite direction, towards "now" and self indulgence?

The article by Jonathan Last addressing these issues is a must-read.

Click here.



Liberal NY Times columnist Nicholas Kristoff says he doesn’t like to admit it, “but conservatives have a point when they suggest that America’s safety net can sometimes entangle people in soul-crushing dependency.” As conservative columnist and pollster Michael Barone notes,

Consider the plight of someone who at some level knows he can work but decides to collect disability payments instead. That person is not likely to ever seek work again, especially if the sluggish recovery turns out to be the new normal. He may be gleeful that he was able to game the system or just grimly determined to get what he can in a tough situation. But he will not be able to get the satisfaction of earned success from honest work that contributes something to society and the economy.” Generosity that produces “soul-crushing dependency” is not really generosity.

Of course, that’s just what Obama wants, to create a dependent class of voters who will support Democrats no matter what. He could care less about teaching them how to fish.

So where are we as a nation? Demographer Nicholas Eberstadt has published a short book entitled “A Nation of Takers: America’s Entitlement Epidemic.” It’s a horrifying account of how much the entitlement mentality has already corrupted minds and burdened the economy. One fact: The percentage of American males in their 30s not in the workforce and not looking for work is higher than the percentage in Greece!

The history of socialism is one of failure, but Obama is relentlessly pushing the U.S. in that direction. Even 61% of Americans polled see that. Yet 52% of voters voted for him anyway. The poll also shows how sharply views differ. Some think Obama is a “great” president and others (mostly Republicans) know he is destructive and a disaster for the nation. A sizeable majority recognize how biased the media was to Obama.

Professor Thomas Sowell reminds us that socialism leads to equality, yes, equality of poverty.

Leading conservative light Jim DeMint leaves the Senate for the Heritage Foundation.

Jim DeMint was a giant in the Senate. He was a fighter. His departure is a real loss. It's unclear who will take up the mantle of leading the conservative cause.

Why did Jim leave? He didn’t see much conservative vigor among his colleagues. “I just believed that Republicans have not been reliable partners of the conservative cause,” he said. “I think there is a lack of vision and boldness that we need at the national level.” He’s frustrated with the Senate, but intends to fight on in what he believes will be in a role in which he can be more effective DeMint went on to point out that successes are taking place:

[C]onservative ideas are working at the state level all around the country. Right-to-work states are attracting businesses. School choice is working for minorities and the poor. And we can prove that Obama’s policies, liberal, progressive policies, in California, Illinois, New York — you can see where they’re going. We are going to continue to lose elections at the national level if we don’t convince Americans that our ideas are better.”

It's heartening that new conservative leaders have emerged in states like Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio and now Michigan with its adoption of right-to-work legislation.

But the task DeMint takes on is monumental. Generations have been brainwashed and indoctrinated by the left-controlled media, entertainment industry, and the education industry from kindergarten through graduate school that what is good is big government, "equality," "social justice," "fairness," "entitlement," and lots of new "rights," but nothing about responsibilities, accountability, hard work, initiative, the reality of competition and the need to strive to succeed.

It's not only that the ideas Jim DeMint talks about are better. They are what built this nation. The left's march towards socialism and away from Judeo-Christian morality and the principles and concepts of our founders enshrined in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence is far advanced. Can the march be halted and turned back? Is our culture gone?

Was the 2012 election evidence that the tipping point has been reached and gone by? Are we a nation of dependents reaching out to the government for our daily dole?

The economics just don't work, the government can't just keep showering everyone with benefits. Sooner or later, the money will run out, the economy will collapse. Look at history. Look at Spain, Greece, Portugal.

It can't go on like this. But, then, as Vladimir said to Estragon in Waiting for Godot, "That's what you think."



Pope John Paul II High School in Hyannis (Massachusetts) is just five years old. It has made amazing progress in attracting great students and providing quality education and a full student life. Its website tells the story, but it is the testimony of parents and staff that bring it to life.


Contact: Diane Bronsdon 508 945 9218
C R Facebook
To help us do our part to keep America strong and well informed, just click below. Donate Now!


Michael O'Keffe District Attorney
Leo Cakounes Barn.Cty Commish
Sheriff Cummings
Hot Air
Legal Insurrection
National Review
Power Line
Pajamas Media


Semper Fi Fund
Cape Cod Cares for Our Troops
Wounded Warrior Family Support
New England Center and Home for Veterans
Chatham Info
Monthly Archive

Category Yearly Archives